Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, Peru

This report draws on fieldwork done in Machu Picchu, Peru in order to critique the Wittemyer et al. (2008) study on population growth around protected areas. I disagree with the study's emphasis on reducing people's motives to economic drives alone. The study separates the political from t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luciano, Pellegrino (author)
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11675/771
http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2011;volume=9;issue=1;spage=35;epage=41;aulast=Luciano
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1870679735836606465
author Luciano, Pellegrino
author_facet Luciano, Pellegrino
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Luciano, Pellegrino
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2016-04-07T08:38:08Z
2016-04-07T08:38:08Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11675/771
http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2011;volume=9;issue=1;spage=35;epage=41;aulast=Luciano
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Conservation and Society
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, Peru
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Journal Article
Peer-Reviewed
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description This report draws on fieldwork done in Machu Picchu, Peru in order to critique the Wittemyer et al. (2008) study on population growth around protected areas. I disagree with the study's emphasis on reducing people's motives to economic drives alone. The study separates the political from the economic by attempting to fix motives as economic calculations. I argue that a homogenous social process does not drive the population of the protected area. The approach used by Wittemyer et al. (2008) risks constructing a dichotomy that frames inhabitants of protected areas as either 'needy' or 'greedy', and fails to recognise that protected areas can form different kinds of political spaces for locals. In Machu Picchu the failure to recognise political space leads to many misunderstandings between locals and conservationists. The paper is a reminder that even for locals, protected areas involve discursive and political relations and the construction of a public sphere that has its own drive and momentum.
id AUKR_5ceb8ec3c69eb20b6e688f3e3c876f49
network_acronym_str AUKR
network_name_str AU Kuwait Rep
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.auk.edu.kw:11675/771
publishDate 2011
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, PeruLuciano, PellegrinoThis report draws on fieldwork done in Machu Picchu, Peru in order to critique the Wittemyer et al. (2008) study on population growth around protected areas. I disagree with the study's emphasis on reducing people's motives to economic drives alone. The study separates the political from the economic by attempting to fix motives as economic calculations. I argue that a homogenous social process does not drive the population of the protected area. The approach used by Wittemyer et al. (2008) risks constructing a dichotomy that frames inhabitants of protected areas as either 'needy' or 'greedy', and fails to recognise that protected areas can form different kinds of political spaces for locals. In Machu Picchu the failure to recognise political space leads to many misunderstandings between locals and conservationists. The paper is a reminder that even for locals, protected areas involve discursive and political relations and the construction of a public sphere that has its own drive and momentum.2016-04-07T08:38:08Z2016-04-07T08:38:08Z2011Journal ArticlePeer-Reviewedinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11675/771http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2011;volume=9;issue=1;spage=35;epage=41;aulast=LucianoConservation and Societyoai:dspace.auk.edu.kw:11675/7712022-01-13T09:22:03Z
spellingShingle Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, Peru
Luciano, Pellegrino
status_str publishedVersion
title Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, Peru
title_full Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, Peru
title_fullStr Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, Peru
title_full_unstemmed Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, Peru
title_short Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, Peru
title_sort Where are the Edges of a Protected Area? Political Dispossession in Machu Picchu, Peru
url http://hdl.handle.net/11675/771
http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2011;volume=9;issue=1;spage=35;epage=41;aulast=Luciano