Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed?
This paper presents analysis of the trade off between hardware overhead, runtime, and test data volume when implementing systematic scan reconfiguration using centralized and distributed architectures of the segmented addressable scan, which is an Illinois-scan based architecture. The results show t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , |
| Format: | article |
| Published: |
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/1/14288_1.pdf https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/2/14288_2.doc |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1864513393698799616 |
|---|---|
| author | Al-Yamani, A. |
| author2 | Devta-Prasanna, N. Gunda, A. unknown |
| author2_role | author author author |
| author_facet | Al-Yamani, A. Devta-Prasanna, N. Gunda, A. unknown |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Al-Yamani, A. Devta-Prasanna, N. Gunda, A. unknown |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2005-10 2020 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf application/msword |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/1/14288_1.pdf https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/2/14288_2.doc (2005) Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, 2005. DFT 2005. 20th IEEE International Symposium on, 1. |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | en en |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | IEEE |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/ |
| dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Computer |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Article PeerReviewed info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| description | This paper presents analysis of the trade off between hardware overhead, runtime, and test data volume when implementing systematic scan reconfiguration using centralized and distributed architectures of the segmented addressable scan, which is an Illinois-scan based architecture. The results show that the centralized scheme offers better data volume compression, similar ATPG runtime results and lower hardware overhead. The cost with the centralized scheme is in the routing congestion. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | KFUPM_dac02feff8adba31b3343303d4d45c60 |
| identifier_str_mv | (2005) Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, 2005. DFT 2005. 20th IEEE International Symposium on, 1. |
| language_invalid_str_mv | en |
| network_acronym_str | KFUPM |
| network_name_str | King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals |
| oai_identifier_str | oai::14288 |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | IEEE |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| spelling | Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed?Al-Yamani, A.Devta-Prasanna, N.Gunda, A.unknownComputerThis paper presents analysis of the trade off between hardware overhead, runtime, and test data volume when implementing systematic scan reconfiguration using centralized and distributed architectures of the segmented addressable scan, which is an Illinois-scan based architecture. The results show that the centralized scheme offers better data volume compression, similar ATPG runtime results and lower hardware overhead. The cost with the centralized scheme is in the routing congestion.IEEE2005-102020ArticlePeerReviewedinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/mswordhttps://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/1/14288_1.pdfhttps://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/2/14288_2.doc (2005) Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, 2005. DFT 2005. 20th IEEE International Symposium on, 1. enenhttps://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai::142882019-11-01T14:05:09Z |
| spellingShingle | Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? Al-Yamani, A. Computer |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? |
| title_full | Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? |
| title_fullStr | Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? |
| title_short | Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? |
| title_sort | Should Illinois-scan based architectures be centralized or distributed? |
| topic | Computer |
| url | https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/1/14288_1.pdf https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/id/eprint/14288/2/14288_2.doc |