Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?

The study examines the effect of form-focused corrective feedback (FFCF) on students’ ability to reduce pronoun agreement errors and lexical errors in new essays. Two experimental groups received on three assignments: direct error correction along with metalinguistic feedback, and only metalinguisti...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi (author)
التنسيق: article
منشور في: 2015
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7989
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293515000021
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513483749457920
author Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi
author_facet Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2018-06-05T06:13:26Z
2018-06-05T06:13:26Z
2018-06-05
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 1873-5916
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7989
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001
Diab, N. M. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?. Assessing Writing, 24, 16-34.
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293515000021
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Assessing Writing
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description The study examines the effect of form-focused corrective feedback (FFCF) on students’ ability to reduce pronoun agreement errors and lexical errors in new essays. Two experimental groups received on three assignments: direct error correction along with metalinguistic feedback, and only metalinguistic feedback, respectively; while the control group self edited their errors. All groups revised their errors before the next assignment. Students took pretest, immediate and delayed post-tests, and the two experimental groups were interviewed about the FFCF received. Results of the immediate post-test revealed a significant difference in pronoun agreement errors of the direct metalinguistic group; no significant difference appeared in lexical errors. At the delayed post-test, there was no significant difference among the groups in pronoun agreement errors, but a significant difference appeared in lexical errors of the direct metalinguistic group. Theoretical explanation and pedagogical implications are discussed.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id LAURepo_00a21e39b87f417cee1377c5d2170667
identifier_str_mv 1873-5916
Diab, N. M. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?. Assessing Writing, 24, 16-34.
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str LAURepo
network_name_str Lebanese American University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/7989
publishDate 2015
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?Diab, Nuwar MawlawiThe study examines the effect of form-focused corrective feedback (FFCF) on students’ ability to reduce pronoun agreement errors and lexical errors in new essays. Two experimental groups received on three assignments: direct error correction along with metalinguistic feedback, and only metalinguistic feedback, respectively; while the control group self edited their errors. All groups revised their errors before the next assignment. Students took pretest, immediate and delayed post-tests, and the two experimental groups were interviewed about the FFCF received. Results of the immediate post-test revealed a significant difference in pronoun agreement errors of the direct metalinguistic group; no significant difference appeared in lexical errors. At the delayed post-test, there was no significant difference among the groups in pronoun agreement errors, but a significant difference appeared in lexical errors of the direct metalinguistic group. Theoretical explanation and pedagogical implications are discussed.PublishedN/A2018-06-05T06:13:26Z2018-06-05T06:13:26Z20152018-06-05Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1873-5916http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7989https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001Diab, N. M. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?. Assessing Writing, 24, 16-34.http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.phphttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293515000021enAssessing Writinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/79892024-04-19T11:15:02Z
spellingShingle Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi
status_str publishedVersion
title Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
title_full Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
title_fullStr Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
title_short Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
title_sort Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
url http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7989
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293515000021