Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC)
ERCP is currently the method of choice for the postoperative evaluation of suspected bile duct stones seen on IOC. The false positive rate of IOC has ranged widely in prior studies, from 2-60% and it is unclear whether there are specific predictors that could be used risk stratify patients to underg...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | , , , , , |
| التنسيق: | article |
| منشور في: |
2014
|
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.389 http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php http://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(14)00559-8/abstract |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| _version_ | 1864513463629381632 |
|---|---|
| author | Azar, Riad R. |
| author2 | Bill, Jason Mullady, Daniel Murad, Faris Early, Dayna S. Edmundowicz, Steven A. Kushnir, Vladimir M. |
| author2_role | author author author author author author |
| author_facet | Azar, Riad R. Bill, Jason Mullady, Daniel Murad, Faris Early, Dayna S. Edmundowicz, Steven A. Kushnir, Vladimir M. |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Azar, Riad R. Bill, Jason Mullady, Daniel Murad, Faris Early, Dayna S. Edmundowicz, Steven A. Kushnir, Vladimir M. |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2014 2016-09-29T13:19:29Z 2016-09-29T13:19:29Z 2016-09-29 |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 0016-5107 http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.389 Bill, J., Mullady, D., Murad, F., Azar, R. R., Easler, J. J., Early, D. S., & Kushnir, V. M. (2014). Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC): Should Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Be the Initial Study of Choice?. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 79(5), AB352. http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php http://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(14)00559-8/abstract |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | en |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
| dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) Should Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Be the Initial Study of Choice? |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| description | ERCP is currently the method of choice for the postoperative evaluation of suspected bile duct stones seen on IOC. The false positive rate of IOC has ranged widely in prior studies, from 2-60% and it is unclear whether there are specific predictors that could be used risk stratify patients to undergo postoperative ERCP vs. less invasive diagnostic testing. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | LAURepo_16ca9c873e0c71cdd4cd436e7f2ffca8 |
| identifier_str_mv | 0016-5107 Bill, J., Mullady, D., Murad, F., Azar, R. R., Easler, J. J., Early, D. S., & Kushnir, V. M. (2014). Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC): Should Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Be the Initial Study of Choice?. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 79(5), AB352. |
| language_invalid_str_mv | en |
| network_acronym_str | LAURepo |
| network_name_str | Lebanese American University repository |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/4459 |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| spelling | Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC)Should Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Be the Initial Study of Choice?Azar, Riad R.Bill, JasonMullady, DanielMurad, FarisEarly, Dayna S.Edmundowicz, Steven A.Kushnir, Vladimir M.ERCP is currently the method of choice for the postoperative evaluation of suspected bile duct stones seen on IOC. The false positive rate of IOC has ranged widely in prior studies, from 2-60% and it is unclear whether there are specific predictors that could be used risk stratify patients to undergo postoperative ERCP vs. less invasive diagnostic testing.PublishedN/A2016-09-29T13:19:29Z2016-09-29T13:19:29Z20142016-09-29Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article0016-5107http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4459http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.389Bill, J., Mullady, D., Murad, F., Azar, R. R., Easler, J. J., Early, D. S., & Kushnir, V. M. (2014). Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC): Should Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Be the Initial Study of Choice?. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 79(5), AB352.http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.phphttp://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(14)00559-8/abstractenGastrointestinal Endoscopyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/44592021-03-19T10:03:18Z |
| spellingShingle | Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) Azar, Riad R. |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) |
| title_full | Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) |
| title_short | Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) |
| title_sort | Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Bile Duct Stone on Intraoperative Cholangiogram (IOC) |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.389 http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php http://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(14)00559-8/abstract |