Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures

Five recently developed one-equation turbulence models are assessed against experiments for several flows. These models are the Menter model, modified Menter model, Wu–Nagano model, Fares–Schröder model, and Goldberg model. All models except the latter, which was constructed using physical arguments...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Elkhoury, Michel (author)
التنسيق: article
منشور في: 2011
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://hdl.handle.net/10725/3101
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.J050648
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.J050648
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513473649573888
author Elkhoury, Michel
author_facet Elkhoury, Michel
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Elkhoury, Michel
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2016-02-17T08:58:00Z
2016-02-17T08:58:00Z
2016-02-17
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 0001-1452
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/3101
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.J050648
Elkhoury, M. (2011). Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures. AIAA journal, 49(7), 1399-1408.
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.J050648
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv AIAA Journal
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description Five recently developed one-equation turbulence models are assessed against experiments for several flows. These models are the Menter model, modified Menter model, Wu–Nagano model, Fares–Schröder model, and Goldberg model. All models except the latter, which was constructed using physical arguments in boundary layers, were developed using Menter’s methodology of transforming two-equation turbulence models to one-equation models using Bradshaw’s correlation. The destruction term of the modified Menter model is modified and tested for all considered test cases. This modification renders the model Galilean-invariant and independent of the freestream value of the turbulent intensity. The Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model is also investigated for comparison with the five aforementioned models. Calculations are presented for internal and external flowfields, including zero-pressuregradient flow over a flat plate, separation and reattachment flows in a backward-facing step, shock/boundary-layer interaction, and adverse-pressure-gradient flows over airfoils at various angles of attack. Although the modified Menter model demonstrates improved predictive capabilities in the majority of the considered cases, its contribution is relatively moderate when compared with existing models.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id LAURepo_3d704c85ab9315f7620e85cb02c81697
identifier_str_mv 0001-1452
Elkhoury, M. (2011). Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures. AIAA journal, 49(7), 1399-1408.
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str LAURepo
network_name_str Lebanese American University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/3101
publishDate 2011
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence ClosuresElkhoury, MichelFive recently developed one-equation turbulence models are assessed against experiments for several flows. These models are the Menter model, modified Menter model, Wu–Nagano model, Fares–Schröder model, and Goldberg model. All models except the latter, which was constructed using physical arguments in boundary layers, were developed using Menter’s methodology of transforming two-equation turbulence models to one-equation models using Bradshaw’s correlation. The destruction term of the modified Menter model is modified and tested for all considered test cases. This modification renders the model Galilean-invariant and independent of the freestream value of the turbulent intensity. The Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model is also investigated for comparison with the five aforementioned models. Calculations are presented for internal and external flowfields, including zero-pressuregradient flow over a flat plate, separation and reattachment flows in a backward-facing step, shock/boundary-layer interaction, and adverse-pressure-gradient flows over airfoils at various angles of attack. Although the modified Menter model demonstrates improved predictive capabilities in the majority of the considered cases, its contribution is relatively moderate when compared with existing models.PublishedN/A2016-02-17T08:58:00Z2016-02-17T08:58:00Z20112016-02-17Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article0001-1452http://hdl.handle.net/10725/3101http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.J050648Elkhoury, M. (2011). Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures. AIAA journal, 49(7), 1399-1408.http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.J050648enAIAA Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/31012019-02-01T13:29:10Z
spellingShingle Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures
Elkhoury, Michel
status_str publishedVersion
title Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures
title_full Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures
title_fullStr Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures
title_full_unstemmed Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures
title_short Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures
title_sort Modified Menter Model in Comparison with Recently Developed Single-Equation Turbulence Closures
url http://hdl.handle.net/10725/3101
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.J050648
http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.J050648