Coexistence of a pseudogap and a superconducting gap for the high− superconductor La2−⁢Sr⁢CuO4 studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy

The relationship between the superconducting gap and the pseudogap has been the subject of controversies. In order to clarify this issue, we have studied the superconducting gap and pseudogap of the high− superconductor La2−⁢Sr⁢CuO4 (=0.10,14) by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). Th...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Yoshida, T. (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Malaeb, W. (author), Ideta, S. (author), Lu, D. H. (author), Moor, R. G. (author), Shen, Z.-X. (author), Okawa, M. (author), Kiss, T. (author), Ishizaka, K. (author)
التنسيق: article
منشور في: 2016
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://hdl.handle.net/10725/16698
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.014513
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
الوصف
الملخص:The relationship between the superconducting gap and the pseudogap has been the subject of controversies. In order to clarify this issue, we have studied the superconducting gap and pseudogap of the high− superconductor La2−⁢Sr⁢CuO4 (=0.10,14) by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). Through the analysis of the ARPES spectra above and below , we have identified a superconducting coherence peak even in the antinodal region on top of the pseudogap of a larger energy scale. The superconducting peak energy nearly follows the pure -wave form. The -wave order parameter Δ0 [defined by Δ⁡()=Δ0⁡(cos⁡⁢−cos⁡⁢) ] for =0.10 and 0.14 are nearly the same, Δ0∼12–14meV, leading to strong coupling 2⁢Δ0/⁢∼10. The present result indicates that the pseudogap and the superconducting gap are distinct phenomena and can be described by the “two-gap” scenario.