Comparison of material flow stress models toward more realistic simulations of friction stir processes of Mg AZ31B
Utilizing a proper material model for describing the mechanical behavior of any material is key for a successful simulation of friction stir processing (FSP) where temperature, strain, and strain rate gradients vary abruptly within, and when moving away, from the stirring zone. This work presents a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | article |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7154 http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.922.18 http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php https://www.scientific.net/AMR.922.18 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Utilizing a proper material model for describing the mechanical behavior of any material is key for a successful simulation of friction stir processing (FSP) where temperature, strain, and strain rate gradients vary abruptly within, and when moving away, from the stirring zone. This work presents a comparison of how faithfully do three different constitutive equations reproduce the state variables of strain, strain rate, and temperature in an FEM simulation of a test-case FSP (1000 rpm spindle speed, and 90 mm/min feed). The three material models considered in this comparison are namely: Johnson-Cook (JC), Sellars-Tegart (ST), and Zerilli-Armstrong (ZA). Constants for these constitutive equations are obtained by fitting these equations to experimental mechanical behavior data collected under a range of strain rates and temperatures of twin-rolled cast wrought AZ31B sheets.It is widely recognized that JC-based models over predicts stress values in the stir zone whereas ST-based models are incapable of capturing work hardening outside of the stir zone. Therefore, a ZA model, being a physical based-HCP specific model, is hereby investigated for its suitability as a material model that would overcome such drawbacks of JC-and ST-based models. The equations from the constitutive models under consideration are fed into an FEM model built using DEFORM 3D to simulate the traverse phases of a friction stir process. Amongst these three material models, comparison results suggest that the HCP-specific ZA model yield better predictions of the state variables: strain, strain rate, and temperature, and, consequently, the estimated values for flow stresses. |
|---|