Fiducial placement for stereotactic radiation by using EUS
Background: Stereotactic radiation by using fiducial markers permits higher doses of radiation while reducing the exposure of uninvolved, adjacent structures. EUS has been used to deploy fiducials, although a 19-gauge needle has traditionally been required. Objective: To report a new technique and t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | article |
| Published: |
2010
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.023 http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510709027485 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background: Stereotactic radiation by using fiducial markers permits higher doses of radiation while reducing the exposure of uninvolved, adjacent structures. EUS has been used to deploy fiducials, although a 19-gauge needle has traditionally been required. Objective: To report a new technique and the feasibility of deploying a fiducial compatible with a 22-gauge needle under EUS guidance. Design: Single-center, case series. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Patients: Thirteen patients with primary or metastatic cancer referred for stereotactic radiation. Interventions: EUS-guided placement of a single fiducial marker that is compatible with a 22-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Main Outcome Measurements: Technical success and complications. Results: Thirteen patients referred for EUS-guided placement of a fiducial marker were identified in the endoscopic database. Targeted lesions measured 27 13 mm (range 8-50) 21 10 mm (range 6-42). All fiducials were successfully deployed, 9 using a transgastric and 4 using a transduodenal approach. There were no EUS-associated complications. Two patients did not proceed to radiation therapy as a result of interval peritoneal metastasis. However, all fiducials were visible on the roentogram. Eleven of 13 patients (85%) required placement of 1 fiducial, whereas 2 patients (15%) required 2 fiducials. Limitations: Uncontrolled feasibility study with limited sample size and follow-up. Conclusion: EUS-guided placement of a fiducial using a 22-gauge needle is technically feasible and may permit greater access compared with the 19-gauge needle technique. |
|---|