Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor

Background American Gastroenterological Association guidelines recommend performing EUS to characterize subepithelial lesions (SELs) discovered on upper endoscopy (EGD), followed by surveillance if no high-risk features are identified. However, limited data are available on the impact of and complia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Azar, Riad R. (author)
Other Authors: Kushnir, Vladimir M. (author), Keswani, Rajesh N. (author), Hollander, Thomas G. (author), Kohlmeier, Cara (author), Mullady, Daniel K. (author), Murad, Faris M. (author), Komanduri, Srinadh (author), Edmundowicz, Steven A. (author), Early, Dayna S. (author)
Format: article
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.013
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510714024134
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1864513463598972928
author Azar, Riad R.
author2 Kushnir, Vladimir M.
Keswani, Rajesh N.
Hollander, Thomas G.
Kohlmeier, Cara
Mullady, Daniel K.
Murad, Faris M.
Komanduri, Srinadh
Edmundowicz, Steven A.
Early, Dayna S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Azar, Riad R.
Kushnir, Vladimir M.
Keswani, Rajesh N.
Hollander, Thomas G.
Kohlmeier, Cara
Mullady, Daniel K.
Murad, Faris M.
Komanduri, Srinadh
Edmundowicz, Steven A.
Early, Dayna S.
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Azar, Riad R.
Kushnir, Vladimir M.
Keswani, Rajesh N.
Hollander, Thomas G.
Kohlmeier, Cara
Mullady, Daniel K.
Murad, Faris M.
Komanduri, Srinadh
Edmundowicz, Steven A.
Early, Dayna S.
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2016-09-28T11:55:25Z
2016-09-28T11:55:25Z
2016-09-28
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 0016-5107
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.013
Kushnir, V. M., Keswani, R. N., Hollander, T. G., Kohlmeier, C., Mullady, D. K., Azar, R. R., ... & Early, D. S. (2015). Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor: results of a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 81(6), 1378-1384.
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510714024134
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor
results of a prospective multicenter study
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description Background American Gastroenterological Association guidelines recommend performing EUS to characterize subepithelial lesions (SELs) discovered on upper endoscopy (EGD), followed by surveillance if no high-risk features are identified. However, limited data are available on the impact of and compliance with surveillance recommendations. Objective To determine the natural history of SELs < 30 mm in size evaluated by EUS and to determine the degree of patient compliance with surveillance recommendations. Design Prospective registry. Setting Two tertiary centers. Patients We studied 187 consecutive adult patients referred for EUS evaluation of foregut SELs. Main Outcome Measurements Proportion of patients in whom SELs change in size or echo-features and compliance with follow-up recommendations. Results Surveillance was recommended in 65 patients with hypoechoic SELs (44.6% women, age 59.5 ± 13.2 years); of these, 29 (44.6%) underwent surveillance EUS as recommended and were followed for a median of 30 months (range, 12-105). During follow-up, 16 SELs (25%) increased in size, with a mean increase of 3.4 ± 3.9 mm (range, 1-15). No changes in echo-texture of the SELs were observed. One patient was referred to surgery during follow-up (because of SEL growth > 30 mm). Limitations Short follow-up duration; compliance was a secondary aim. Conclusions During a median follow-up of 30 months, growth in size was observed in 25% of small foregut SELs. However, change in size was minimal, and only 1 patient was referred for surgery based on surveillance EUS findings. Compliance with surveillance recommendations is poor, with fewer than 50% of patients undergoing surveillance EUS as recommended.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id LAURepo_6b2110e5075cfba22ef9c2fdec3fc091
identifier_str_mv 0016-5107
Kushnir, V. M., Keswani, R. N., Hollander, T. G., Kohlmeier, C., Mullady, D. K., Azar, R. R., ... & Early, D. S. (2015). Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor: results of a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 81(6), 1378-1384.
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str LAURepo
network_name_str Lebanese American University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/4439
publishDate 2015
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poorresults of a prospective multicenter studyAzar, Riad R.Kushnir, Vladimir M.Keswani, Rajesh N.Hollander, Thomas G.Kohlmeier, CaraMullady, Daniel K.Murad, Faris M.Komanduri, SrinadhEdmundowicz, Steven A.Early, Dayna S.Background American Gastroenterological Association guidelines recommend performing EUS to characterize subepithelial lesions (SELs) discovered on upper endoscopy (EGD), followed by surveillance if no high-risk features are identified. However, limited data are available on the impact of and compliance with surveillance recommendations. Objective To determine the natural history of SELs < 30 mm in size evaluated by EUS and to determine the degree of patient compliance with surveillance recommendations. Design Prospective registry. Setting Two tertiary centers. Patients We studied 187 consecutive adult patients referred for EUS evaluation of foregut SELs. Main Outcome Measurements Proportion of patients in whom SELs change in size or echo-features and compliance with follow-up recommendations. Results Surveillance was recommended in 65 patients with hypoechoic SELs (44.6% women, age 59.5 ± 13.2 years); of these, 29 (44.6%) underwent surveillance EUS as recommended and were followed for a median of 30 months (range, 12-105). During follow-up, 16 SELs (25%) increased in size, with a mean increase of 3.4 ± 3.9 mm (range, 1-15). No changes in echo-texture of the SELs were observed. One patient was referred to surgery during follow-up (because of SEL growth > 30 mm). Limitations Short follow-up duration; compliance was a secondary aim. Conclusions During a median follow-up of 30 months, growth in size was observed in 25% of small foregut SELs. However, change in size was minimal, and only 1 patient was referred for surgery based on surveillance EUS findings. Compliance with surveillance recommendations is poor, with fewer than 50% of patients undergoing surveillance EUS as recommended.PublishedN/A2016-09-28T11:55:25Z2016-09-28T11:55:25Z20152016-09-28Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article0016-5107http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4439http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.013Kushnir, V. M., Keswani, R. N., Hollander, T. G., Kohlmeier, C., Mullady, D. K., Azar, R. R., ... & Early, D. S. (2015). Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor: results of a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 81(6), 1378-1384.http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.phphttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510714024134enGastrointestinal Endoscopyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/44392021-03-19T10:00:55Z
spellingShingle Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor
Azar, Riad R.
status_str publishedVersion
title Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor
title_full Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor
title_fullStr Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor
title_full_unstemmed Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor
title_short Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor
title_sort Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor
url http://hdl.handle.net/10725/4439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.013
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510714024134