The current status of anatomy knowledge

Background: Gross anatomy is no longer considered a science, as it is no longer considered a research-led discipline. Looking to the current status of anatomical teaching, there is worldwide unanimity regarding the steady decline in the provision of contact hours of this basic science in a crowded u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yammine, Kaissar (author)
Format: article
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10918
https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2014.883985
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10401334.2014.883985
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1864513487864070144
author Yammine, Kaissar
author_facet Yammine, Kaissar
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Yammine, Kaissar
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2019-06-27T11:24:56Z
2019-06-27T11:24:56Z
2019-06-27
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 1532-8015
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10918
https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2014.883985
Yammine, K. (2014). The current status of anatomy knowledge: where are we now? Where do we need to go and how do we get there?. Teaching and learning in medicine, 26(2), 184-188.
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10401334.2014.883985
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Teaching and Learning in Medicine
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The current status of anatomy knowledge
where are we now? where do we need to go and how do we get there?
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description Background: Gross anatomy is no longer considered a science, as it is no longer considered a research-led discipline. Looking to the current status of anatomical teaching, there is worldwide unanimity regarding the steady decline in the provision of contact hours of this basic science in a crowded undergraduate curriculum. The same could apply at the postgraduate level for specialties where surgical anatomy is essential. The long-term consequence of this shortage of optimal anatomical knowledge is thought to have implications on patient safety. Summary: Where are we now? Anatomy has been, and is still, severely affected by a content and extent reduction policy in most medical schools. Such suboptimal anatomy education has been linked to an increase in some types of medico-legal claims. This could be due in part to the rapid rise of modern learning approaches, lack of gross anatomy teachers, and lack of structured programs. Which direction are we taking, and where do we need to go? The introduction of surface anatomy at the undergraduate level, the implementation of surgical anatomy courses at the postgraduate level, and the revival of dissection courses at both levels could be measures that change the direction of the actual status. How do we get there? (a) The implementation of a national anatomy core curriculum by local medical education societies with a requirement stating the provision of a clinically oriented surface anatomy course. (b) Making room for the time-tested dissection method to be taught in gross anatomy at both levels. (c) The development of explicit and formal teaching in surgical anatomy via postgraduate courses for the concerned specialties. (d) An evaluation of the 3D visualization technology and surgical simulation applied to anatomy teaching. Conclusions: The current suboptimal anatomy knowledge should be acknowledged, and ways to change the course should be searched for. I present my views for possible and practical solutions by introducing surface anatomy at an undergraduate level, implementing surgical anatomy courses at a postgraduate level, and returning to the dissection room at both levels.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id LAURepo_703db0d8c0d29ff30f8d42b712080189
identifier_str_mv 1532-8015
Yammine, K. (2014). The current status of anatomy knowledge: where are we now? Where do we need to go and how do we get there?. Teaching and learning in medicine, 26(2), 184-188.
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str LAURepo
network_name_str Lebanese American University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/10918
publishDate 2014
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling The current status of anatomy knowledgewhere are we now? where do we need to go and how do we get there?Yammine, KaissarBackground: Gross anatomy is no longer considered a science, as it is no longer considered a research-led discipline. Looking to the current status of anatomical teaching, there is worldwide unanimity regarding the steady decline in the provision of contact hours of this basic science in a crowded undergraduate curriculum. The same could apply at the postgraduate level for specialties where surgical anatomy is essential. The long-term consequence of this shortage of optimal anatomical knowledge is thought to have implications on patient safety. Summary: Where are we now? Anatomy has been, and is still, severely affected by a content and extent reduction policy in most medical schools. Such suboptimal anatomy education has been linked to an increase in some types of medico-legal claims. This could be due in part to the rapid rise of modern learning approaches, lack of gross anatomy teachers, and lack of structured programs. Which direction are we taking, and where do we need to go? The introduction of surface anatomy at the undergraduate level, the implementation of surgical anatomy courses at the postgraduate level, and the revival of dissection courses at both levels could be measures that change the direction of the actual status. How do we get there? (a) The implementation of a national anatomy core curriculum by local medical education societies with a requirement stating the provision of a clinically oriented surface anatomy course. (b) Making room for the time-tested dissection method to be taught in gross anatomy at both levels. (c) The development of explicit and formal teaching in surgical anatomy via postgraduate courses for the concerned specialties. (d) An evaluation of the 3D visualization technology and surgical simulation applied to anatomy teaching. Conclusions: The current suboptimal anatomy knowledge should be acknowledged, and ways to change the course should be searched for. I present my views for possible and practical solutions by introducing surface anatomy at an undergraduate level, implementing surgical anatomy courses at a postgraduate level, and returning to the dissection room at both levels.PublishedN/A2019-06-27T11:24:56Z2019-06-27T11:24:56Z20142019-06-27Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1532-8015http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10918https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2014.883985Yammine, K. (2014). The current status of anatomy knowledge: where are we now? Where do we need to go and how do we get there?. Teaching and learning in medicine, 26(2), 184-188.http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.phphttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10401334.2014.883985enTeaching and Learning in Medicineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/109182021-03-19T10:45:30Z
spellingShingle The current status of anatomy knowledge
Yammine, Kaissar
status_str publishedVersion
title The current status of anatomy knowledge
title_full The current status of anatomy knowledge
title_fullStr The current status of anatomy knowledge
title_full_unstemmed The current status of anatomy knowledge
title_short The current status of anatomy knowledge
title_sort The current status of anatomy knowledge
url http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10918
https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2014.883985
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10401334.2014.883985