The threat of security. (c2014)

This thesis employs Securitization Theory to examine the origins of current US foreign policy towards Iran. It shows how the rational actor model in international relations theory fails to explain the foreign policy behavior of the US towards Iran because of the history of US Orientalist discourse v...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Murray, Marie (author)
التنسيق: masterThesis
منشور في: 2014
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://hdl.handle.net/10725/3250
https://doi.org/10.26756/th.2014.54
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513460259258368
author Murray, Marie
author_facet Murray, Marie
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Murray, Marie
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-20
2016-03-03T08:30:53Z
2016-03-03T08:30:53Z
2016-03-03
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10725/3250
https://doi.org/10.26756/th.2014.54
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lebanese American University
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Economic sanctions, American -- Iran
United States -- Foreign relations -- Middle East
Middle East -- Foreign relations -- United States
United States -- Foreign relations
Nuclear weapons -- Iran
Lebanese American University -- Dissertations
Dissertations, Academic
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The threat of security. (c2014)
securitization and orientalist discourse in United States and foreign policy towards Iran
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Thesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
description This thesis employs Securitization Theory to examine the origins of current US foreign policy towards Iran. It shows how the rational actor model in international relations theory fails to explain the foreign policy behavior of the US towards Iran because of the history of US Orientalist discourse vis-à-vis Iran and the influence of the Israeli lobby in Washington. It argues that Orientalist trends found in US political and international relations discourse towards Iran provide the rationale for the securitizing actions of the US government in dealing with Iranian nuclear weapons. The thesis examines the contents of US presidential addresses, Congressional hearings, the stipulations contained within the most recent sanctions on Iran, transcripts of US Central Intelligence Agency reports and advisory speeches, interactions between Israel and AIPAC and the US administration and the use of loaded Orientalist and securitizing terms – such as “threat,” “evil,” “containment,” and “existential threat to Israel,” to test the hypothesis that US foreign policy discourse creates and responds to false threats in the Middle East due to Israeli influence and the perpetuation of neo-Orientalist views of the Middle East. Finally, it examines how partisanship and presidential administrations influence US foreign policy by parsing out the major changes in discourse from the Bush to the Obama terms.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format masterThesis
id LAURepo_a49e01779127f17c3ef68e73d155f516
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str LAURepo
network_name_str Lebanese American University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/3250
publishDate 2014
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lebanese American University
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling The threat of security. (c2014)securitization and orientalist discourse in United States and foreign policy towards IranMurray, MarieEconomic sanctions, American -- IranUnited States -- Foreign relations -- Middle EastMiddle East -- Foreign relations -- United StatesUnited States -- Foreign relationsNuclear weapons -- IranLebanese American University -- DissertationsDissertations, AcademicThis thesis employs Securitization Theory to examine the origins of current US foreign policy towards Iran. It shows how the rational actor model in international relations theory fails to explain the foreign policy behavior of the US towards Iran because of the history of US Orientalist discourse vis-à-vis Iran and the influence of the Israeli lobby in Washington. It argues that Orientalist trends found in US political and international relations discourse towards Iran provide the rationale for the securitizing actions of the US government in dealing with Iranian nuclear weapons. The thesis examines the contents of US presidential addresses, Congressional hearings, the stipulations contained within the most recent sanctions on Iran, transcripts of US Central Intelligence Agency reports and advisory speeches, interactions between Israel and AIPAC and the US administration and the use of loaded Orientalist and securitizing terms – such as “threat,” “evil,” “containment,” and “existential threat to Israel,” to test the hypothesis that US foreign policy discourse creates and responds to false threats in the Middle East due to Israeli influence and the perpetuation of neo-Orientalist views of the Middle East. Finally, it examines how partisanship and presidential administrations influence US foreign policy by parsing out the major changes in discourse from the Bush to the Obama terms.N/A1 hard copy: ix, 90 leaves; 30cm. available at RNL.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 81-90).Lebanese American University2016-03-03T08:30:53Z2016-03-03T08:30:53Z2016-03-032014-06-20Thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesishttp://hdl.handle.net/10725/3250https://doi.org/10.26756/th.2014.54eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/32502020-05-18T14:53:57Z
spellingShingle The threat of security. (c2014)
Murray, Marie
Economic sanctions, American -- Iran
United States -- Foreign relations -- Middle East
Middle East -- Foreign relations -- United States
United States -- Foreign relations
Nuclear weapons -- Iran
Lebanese American University -- Dissertations
Dissertations, Academic
status_str publishedVersion
title The threat of security. (c2014)
title_full The threat of security. (c2014)
title_fullStr The threat of security. (c2014)
title_full_unstemmed The threat of security. (c2014)
title_short The threat of security. (c2014)
title_sort The threat of security. (c2014)
topic Economic sanctions, American -- Iran
United States -- Foreign relations -- Middle East
Middle East -- Foreign relations -- United States
United States -- Foreign relations
Nuclear weapons -- Iran
Lebanese American University -- Dissertations
Dissertations, Academic
url http://hdl.handle.net/10725/3250
https://doi.org/10.26756/th.2014.54