Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon

Despite being considered as one of the oldest constitutional democracies in the Middle East, Lebanon has been confronted with periodical institutional crises and civil violence. A protracted transitional period towards democracy has threatened the autonomy of deeply fragmented sectarian groups, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Salamey, Imad (author)
Other Authors: Tabar, Paul (author)
Format: article
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10725/2116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550912.2012.714575
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17550912.2012.714575
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1864513457395597312
author Salamey, Imad
author2 Tabar, Paul
author2_role author
author_facet Salamey, Imad
Tabar, Paul
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Salamey, Imad
Tabar, Paul
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-07T11:24:44Z
2015-09-07T11:24:44Z
2015-09-07
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 1755-0912
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/2116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550912.2012.714575
Salamey, I., & Tabar, P. (2012). Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 5(4), 497-512.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17550912.2012.714575
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Contemporary Arab Affairs
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description Despite being considered as one of the oldest constitutional democracies in the Middle East, Lebanon has been confronted with periodical institutional crises and civil violence. A protracted transitional period towards democracy has threatened the autonomy of deeply fragmented sectarian groups, and has instigated a polarizing struggle over nationhood. Fearing the degradation of their power to a majoritarian order, sectarian leaders have resorted to various mobilization strategies to obstruct the emergence of a unifying national identity and democratic state. Consequently, a chronically weak state has emerged, divided along antagonistic sectarian loyalties with power shared according to sectarian consociationalism. In order to reveal the tenets of sectarian populism in Lebanon and their impacts on nation-building, the state and democratic transition, a nationwide opinion survey was conducted by the Lebanese American University (LAU), Beirut, during January of 2011 with a random sample of 586 Lebanese respondents divided along sectarian affiliation. The survey examined differential populist mobilization among major sectarian groups and revealed potential explanatory variables. The results shed light on the formation of populism in a divided society and the challenges it poses for democratic transitions in Lebanon and perhaps in transitional Middle Eastern states.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id LAURepo_b0c45fc819d8c35e8159b0de4aa9cc2d
identifier_str_mv 1755-0912
Salamey, I., & Tabar, P. (2012). Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 5(4), 497-512.
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str LAURepo
network_name_str Lebanese American University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/2116
publishDate 2015
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of LebanonSalamey, ImadTabar, PaulDespite being considered as one of the oldest constitutional democracies in the Middle East, Lebanon has been confronted with periodical institutional crises and civil violence. A protracted transitional period towards democracy has threatened the autonomy of deeply fragmented sectarian groups, and has instigated a polarizing struggle over nationhood. Fearing the degradation of their power to a majoritarian order, sectarian leaders have resorted to various mobilization strategies to obstruct the emergence of a unifying national identity and democratic state. Consequently, a chronically weak state has emerged, divided along antagonistic sectarian loyalties with power shared according to sectarian consociationalism. In order to reveal the tenets of sectarian populism in Lebanon and their impacts on nation-building, the state and democratic transition, a nationwide opinion survey was conducted by the Lebanese American University (LAU), Beirut, during January of 2011 with a random sample of 586 Lebanese respondents divided along sectarian affiliation. The survey examined differential populist mobilization among major sectarian groups and revealed potential explanatory variables. The results shed light on the formation of populism in a divided society and the challenges it poses for democratic transitions in Lebanon and perhaps in transitional Middle Eastern states.PublishedN/A2015-09-07T11:24:44Z2015-09-07T11:24:44Z2015-09-07Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1755-0912http://hdl.handle.net/10725/2116http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550912.2012.714575Salamey, I., & Tabar, P. (2012). Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 5(4), 497-512.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17550912.2012.714575enContemporary Arab Affairsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/21162023-09-28T13:03:30Z
spellingShingle Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon
Salamey, Imad
status_str publishedVersion
title Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon
title_full Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon
title_fullStr Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon
title_full_unstemmed Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon
title_short Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon
title_sort Democratic transition and sectarian populism: the case of Lebanon
url http://hdl.handle.net/10725/2116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550912.2012.714575
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17550912.2012.714575