A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms
We compare five regression testing algorithms that include: slicing, incremental, firewall, genetic and simulated annealing algorithms. The comparison is based on the following ten quantitative and qualitative criteria: execution time, number of selected retests, precision, inclusiveness, user param...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | conferenceObject |
| Published: |
1997
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.1997.623769 http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/623769/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | We compare five regression testing algorithms that include: slicing, incremental, firewall, genetic and simulated annealing algorithms. The comparison is based on the following ten quantitative and qualitative criteria: execution time, number of selected retests, precision, inclusiveness, user parameters, handling of global variables, type of maintenance, type of testing, level of testing, and type of approach. The experimental results show that the five algorithms are suitable for different requirements of regression testing. Nevertheless, the incremental algorithm shows more favorable properties than the others. |
|---|