A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms
We compare five regression testing algorithms that include: slicing, incremental, firewall, genetic and simulated annealing algorithms. The comparison is based on the following ten quantitative and qualitative criteria: execution time, number of selected retests, precision, inclusiveness, user param...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | conferenceObject |
| Published: |
1997
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.1997.623769 http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/623769/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1864513483473682432 |
|---|---|
| author | Mansour, N. |
| author2 | Baradhi, G. |
| author2_role | author |
| author_facet | Mansour, N. Baradhi, G. |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Mansour, N. Baradhi, G. |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 1997 2018-05-23T12:47:51Z 2018-05-23T12:47:51Z 2018-05-23 |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 0-8186-8081-4 http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.1997.623769 Baradhi, G., & Mansour, N. (1997, September). A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms. In Software Engineering Conference, 1997. Proceedings., Australian (pp. 174-182). IEEE. http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/623769/ |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | en |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | IEEE Xplore |
| dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Conference Paper / Proceeding info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
| description | We compare five regression testing algorithms that include: slicing, incremental, firewall, genetic and simulated annealing algorithms. The comparison is based on the following ten quantitative and qualitative criteria: execution time, number of selected retests, precision, inclusiveness, user parameters, handling of global variables, type of maintenance, type of testing, level of testing, and type of approach. The experimental results show that the five algorithms are suitable for different requirements of regression testing. Nevertheless, the incremental algorithm shows more favorable properties than the others. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | conferenceObject |
| id | LAURepo_be6a40156b6fed49b309ed70aec79f5c |
| identifier_str_mv | 0-8186-8081-4 Baradhi, G., & Mansour, N. (1997, September). A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms. In Software Engineering Conference, 1997. Proceedings., Australian (pp. 174-182). IEEE. |
| language_invalid_str_mv | en |
| network_acronym_str | LAURepo |
| network_name_str | Lebanese American University repository |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/7910 |
| publishDate | 1997 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | IEEE Xplore |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| spelling | A comparative study of five regression testing algorithmsMansour, N.Baradhi, G.We compare five regression testing algorithms that include: slicing, incremental, firewall, genetic and simulated annealing algorithms. The comparison is based on the following ten quantitative and qualitative criteria: execution time, number of selected retests, precision, inclusiveness, user parameters, handling of global variables, type of maintenance, type of testing, level of testing, and type of approach. The experimental results show that the five algorithms are suitable for different requirements of regression testing. Nevertheless, the incremental algorithm shows more favorable properties than the others.N/AIEEE Xplore2018-05-23T12:47:51Z2018-05-23T12:47:51Z19972018-05-23Conference Paper / Proceedinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject0-8186-8081-4http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7910http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.1997.623769Baradhi, G., & Mansour, N. (1997, September). A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms. In Software Engineering Conference, 1997. Proceedings., Australian (pp. 174-182). IEEE.http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.phphttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/623769/eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/79102021-03-19T10:43:06Z |
| spellingShingle | A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms Mansour, N. |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms |
| title_full | A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms |
| title_fullStr | A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms |
| title_short | A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms |
| title_sort | A comparative study of five regression testing algorithms |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.1997.623769 http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/623769/ |