The prevalence of os acromiale

Os acromiale (OA) results from a failure of consolidation between the ossification centers of the acromial epiphysis. Its prevalence and its interactions with ancestry, gender, laterality, and side have been variously reported in the literature. The aims of this review are to provide an accurate est...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Yammine, Kaissar (author)
التنسيق: article
منشور في: 2013
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10920
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22343
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ca.22343
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513487866167296
author Yammine, Kaissar
author_facet Yammine, Kaissar
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Yammine, Kaissar
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
2019-06-28T05:48:18Z
2019-06-28T05:48:18Z
2019-06-28
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 1098-2353
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10920
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22343
Yammine, K. (2014). The prevalence of os acromiale: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Anatomy, 27(4), 610-621.
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ca.22343
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Clinical anatomy
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The prevalence of os acromiale
a systematic review and meta‐analysis
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description Os acromiale (OA) results from a failure of consolidation between the ossification centers of the acromial epiphysis. Its prevalence and its interactions with ancestry, gender, laterality, and side have been variously reported in the literature. The aims of this review are to provide an accurate estimate of OA prevalence and to investigate its association with other variables in an attempt to comprehend its etiology. Twenty‐three studies met the inclusion criteria. The results of meta‐analyses of large‐sample studies revealed: (a) a crude overall prevalence of 7.0%, (b) a crude cadaveric prevalence of 7.6%, (c) a crude archeological (skeletal) prevalence of 5.6%, (d) a crude radiological prevalence of 4.2%, (e) a true anatomical prevalence of 9.6%, (f) a significantly higher frequency in persons of black ancestry than in persons of white, Native American and Middle Eastern ancestries (OR ≈ 3), (g) significantly higher unilateral and bilateral frequencies in black ancestry (OR of 2 and 4, respectively), (h) nonsignificant interactions of OA frequency with gender and side. The commonest type of OA was the meso‐acromion type (76.6%). Degenerative changes were present in 66.6% of OAs. The results of this evidence‐based anatomical review support a genetic basis for OA rather than the mechanical trauma‐induction hypothesis.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id LAURepo_cac38b1dbd79f07f5ee9c31fc9466cfc
identifier_str_mv 1098-2353
Yammine, K. (2014). The prevalence of os acromiale: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Anatomy, 27(4), 610-621.
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str LAURepo
network_name_str Lebanese American University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/10920
publishDate 2013
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling The prevalence of os acromialea systematic review and meta‐analysisYammine, KaissarOs acromiale (OA) results from a failure of consolidation between the ossification centers of the acromial epiphysis. Its prevalence and its interactions with ancestry, gender, laterality, and side have been variously reported in the literature. The aims of this review are to provide an accurate estimate of OA prevalence and to investigate its association with other variables in an attempt to comprehend its etiology. Twenty‐three studies met the inclusion criteria. The results of meta‐analyses of large‐sample studies revealed: (a) a crude overall prevalence of 7.0%, (b) a crude cadaveric prevalence of 7.6%, (c) a crude archeological (skeletal) prevalence of 5.6%, (d) a crude radiological prevalence of 4.2%, (e) a true anatomical prevalence of 9.6%, (f) a significantly higher frequency in persons of black ancestry than in persons of white, Native American and Middle Eastern ancestries (OR ≈ 3), (g) significantly higher unilateral and bilateral frequencies in black ancestry (OR of 2 and 4, respectively), (h) nonsignificant interactions of OA frequency with gender and side. The commonest type of OA was the meso‐acromion type (76.6%). Degenerative changes were present in 66.6% of OAs. The results of this evidence‐based anatomical review support a genetic basis for OA rather than the mechanical trauma‐induction hypothesis.PublishedN/A2019-06-28T05:48:18Z2019-06-28T05:48:18Z20132019-06-28Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1098-2353http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10920https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22343Yammine, K. (2014). The prevalence of os acromiale: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Anatomy, 27(4), 610-621.http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.phphttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ca.22343enClinical anatomyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/109202021-03-19T10:45:19Z
spellingShingle The prevalence of os acromiale
Yammine, Kaissar
status_str publishedVersion
title The prevalence of os acromiale
title_full The prevalence of os acromiale
title_fullStr The prevalence of os acromiale
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of os acromiale
title_short The prevalence of os acromiale
title_sort The prevalence of os acromiale
url http://hdl.handle.net/10725/10920
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22343
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ca.22343