Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare

There are several reasons why a firm would want to pay a bribe to a high-level official when bidding for a large scale project. One reason is to induce the corrupt official and/or his agent to manipulate their evaluation of contract proposals in favor of the firm. In my analysis, I am examining the...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Toukan, Amjad (author)
التنسيق: article
منشور في: 2017
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://hdl.handle.net/10725/5910
https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2017.0047
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/657944/pdf
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513478196199424
author Toukan, Amjad
author_facet Toukan, Amjad
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Toukan, Amjad
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-13T10:36:12Z
2017-07-13T10:36:12Z
2017
2017-07-13
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 0022-037X
http://hdl.handle.net/10725/5910
https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2017.0047
Toukan, A. (2017). Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(2), 315-327.
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/657944/pdf
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv The Journal of Developing Areas
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description There are several reasons why a firm would want to pay a bribe to a high-level official when bidding for a large scale project. One reason is to induce the corrupt official and/or his agent to manipulate their evaluation of contract proposals in favor of the firm. In my analysis, I am examining the case where a firm competes to win a government contract. To win the award, the firm may choose to comply with a demand by the corrupt government official for a share of the value of the project to avoid being excluded from trade. The contribution of my paper is that it models the competition between the firm and the corrupt official as a contest where the corrupt official is expending costly efforts in trying to expropriate part of the value of the public project and the firm is also expending costly efforts in trying to protect its profits. Contests have been used to analyze lobbying, rent-seeking, advertising, litigation, arms races, and sports events. A contest is a game in which players exert costly effort in order to win a certain prize. The players' probabilities of winning the prize are determined by the use of a probabilistic choice function that depends on the efforts of adversaries. I incorporate the preferences of the corrupt official and the enforcement of property rights in my model where I am able to shed some light on the impact of these two important variables on social welfare. My results show that with complete information and no corruption, the economy will arrive at an equilibrium that is socially optimal in the sense that social welfare is maximized. In this case the public procurement project will be awarded to the firm that provides the competitive world quality at the competitive world price. In the case of complete information and corruption, my results show that corrupt officials' preferences towards corruption in countries with weak enforcement of property rights play an essential role in determining whether we will arrive at an equilibrium that is socially optimal. I argue that in such countries aligning the incentives of corrupt government officials with that of society is necessary in combating corruption and plays a more important role than strengthening the enforcement of property rights.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id LAURepo_e3bfb77d246df9fe78d0c4ec2d2e164a
identifier_str_mv 0022-037X
Toukan, A. (2017). Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(2), 315-327.
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str LAURepo
network_name_str Lebanese American University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/5910
publishDate 2017
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
spelling Corruption In Public Procurement And Social WelfareToukan, AmjadThere are several reasons why a firm would want to pay a bribe to a high-level official when bidding for a large scale project. One reason is to induce the corrupt official and/or his agent to manipulate their evaluation of contract proposals in favor of the firm. In my analysis, I am examining the case where a firm competes to win a government contract. To win the award, the firm may choose to comply with a demand by the corrupt government official for a share of the value of the project to avoid being excluded from trade. The contribution of my paper is that it models the competition between the firm and the corrupt official as a contest where the corrupt official is expending costly efforts in trying to expropriate part of the value of the public project and the firm is also expending costly efforts in trying to protect its profits. Contests have been used to analyze lobbying, rent-seeking, advertising, litigation, arms races, and sports events. A contest is a game in which players exert costly effort in order to win a certain prize. The players' probabilities of winning the prize are determined by the use of a probabilistic choice function that depends on the efforts of adversaries. I incorporate the preferences of the corrupt official and the enforcement of property rights in my model where I am able to shed some light on the impact of these two important variables on social welfare. My results show that with complete information and no corruption, the economy will arrive at an equilibrium that is socially optimal in the sense that social welfare is maximized. In this case the public procurement project will be awarded to the firm that provides the competitive world quality at the competitive world price. In the case of complete information and corruption, my results show that corrupt officials' preferences towards corruption in countries with weak enforcement of property rights play an essential role in determining whether we will arrive at an equilibrium that is socially optimal. I argue that in such countries aligning the incentives of corrupt government officials with that of society is necessary in combating corruption and plays a more important role than strengthening the enforcement of property rights.PublishedN/A2017-07-13T10:36:12Z2017-07-13T10:36:12Z20172017-07-13Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article0022-037Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10725/5910https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2017.0047Toukan, A. (2017). Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(2), 315-327.http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.phphttps://muse.jhu.edu/article/657944/pdfenThe Journal of Developing Areasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:laur.lau.edu.lb:10725/59102021-03-19T09:10:08Z
spellingShingle Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare
Toukan, Amjad
status_str publishedVersion
title Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare
title_full Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare
title_fullStr Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare
title_full_unstemmed Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare
title_short Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare
title_sort Corruption In Public Procurement And Social Welfare
url http://hdl.handle.net/10725/5910
https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2017.0047
http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/articles.php
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/657944/pdf