An Effective Hybrid NARX-LSTM Model for Point and Interval PV Power Forecasting

<p>This paper proposes an effective Photovoltaic (PV) Power Forecasting (PVPF) technique based on hierarchical learning combining Nonlinear Auto-Regressive Neural Networks with exogenous input (NARXNN) with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model. First, the NARXNN model acquires the data to gener...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Mohamed Massaoudi (16888710) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Ines Chihi (16888713) (author), Lilia Sidhom (16896387) (author), Mohamed Trabelsi (16869891) (author), Shady S. Refaat (16864269) (author), Haitham Abu-Rub (16855500) (author), Fakhreddine S. Oueslati (16888716) (author)
منشور في: 2021
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
الوصف
الملخص:<p>This paper proposes an effective Photovoltaic (PV) Power Forecasting (PVPF) technique based on hierarchical learning combining Nonlinear Auto-Regressive Neural Networks with exogenous input (NARXNN) with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model. First, the NARXNN model acquires the data to generate a residual error vector. Then, the stacked LSTM model, optimized by Tabu search algorithm, uses the residual error correction associated with the original data to produce a point and interval PVPF. The performance of the proposed PVPF technique was investigated using two real datasets with different scales and locations. The comparative analysis of the NARX-LSTM with twelve existing benchmarks confirms its superiority in terms of accuracy measures. In summary, the proposed NARX-LSTM technique has the following major achievements: 1) Improves the prediction performance of the original LSTM and NARXNN models; 2) Evaluates the uncertainties associated with point forecasts with high accuracy; 3) Provides a high generalization capability for PV systems with different scales. Numerical results of the comparison of the proposed NARX-LSTM method with two real-world PV systems in Australia and USA demonstrate its improved prediction accuracy, outperforming the benchmark approaches with an overall normalized Rooted Mean Squared Error (nRMSE) of 1.98% and 1.33% respectively.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p>Published in: IEEE Access<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3062776" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3062776</a></p>