Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal Fistulas

<p dir="ltr">Perianal fistula is a complex condition where surgeons conduct surgeries based on the mentally mapped images they created from the information found in the radiology report. If not properly treated, a fistula could reoccur. To reduce the chances of reoccurrence, a patien...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Sarra Kharbech (22501886) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Nabil Sherif Mahmood (22501889) (author), Ma’mon Qasem (22224901) (author), Julien Abinahed (14151792) (author), Amal Alobadli (22501892) (author), Mohamed Abunada (22501895) (author), Omar Aboumarzouk (18427923) (author), Abdulla Al Ansari (14058060) (author), Shidin Balakrishnan (14150580) (author), Nikhil Navkar (14151798) (author), Adham Darweesh (22501898) (author)
منشور في: 2025
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513534117806080
author Sarra Kharbech (22501886)
author2 Nabil Sherif Mahmood (22501889)
Ma’mon Qasem (22224901)
Julien Abinahed (14151792)
Amal Alobadli (22501892)
Mohamed Abunada (22501895)
Omar Aboumarzouk (18427923)
Abdulla Al Ansari (14058060)
Shidin Balakrishnan (14150580)
Nikhil Navkar (14151798)
Adham Darweesh (22501898)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Sarra Kharbech (22501886)
Nabil Sherif Mahmood (22501889)
Ma’mon Qasem (22224901)
Julien Abinahed (14151792)
Amal Alobadli (22501892)
Mohamed Abunada (22501895)
Omar Aboumarzouk (18427923)
Abdulla Al Ansari (14058060)
Shidin Balakrishnan (14150580)
Nikhil Navkar (14151798)
Adham Darweesh (22501898)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sarra Kharbech (22501886)
Nabil Sherif Mahmood (22501889)
Ma’mon Qasem (22224901)
Julien Abinahed (14151792)
Amal Alobadli (22501892)
Mohamed Abunada (22501895)
Omar Aboumarzouk (18427923)
Abdulla Al Ansari (14058060)
Shidin Balakrishnan (14150580)
Nikhil Navkar (14151798)
Adham Darweesh (22501898)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05-13T09:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1007/s10278-025-01524-4
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Evaluation_of_Reporting_Methods_for_Assessment_and_Surgical_Planning_of_Perianal_Fistulas/30454304
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Health sciences
Health services and systems
Perianal fistula
Surgical planning
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Three-dimensional (3D) visualization
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal Fistulas
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <p dir="ltr">Perianal fistula is a complex condition where surgeons conduct surgeries based on the mentally mapped images they created from the information found in the radiology report. If not properly treated, a fistula could reoccur. To reduce the chances of reoccurrence, a patient-specific, visual, and accurate depiction of the internal tracts in relation to the pelvic floor is required. A three-dimensional (3D) parametric model generation software was previously developed and evaluated successfully with radiologists. In this paper, the software output is evaluated with two colorectal surgeons for 10 fistula cases. The paper compares three reporting different modes: (1) 3D models only, (2) conventional radiology report and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) magnetic resonance (MR) images, and (3) 3D models + standardized radiology report. The percentage of agreement between surgeons across cases and cognitive load are the primary metrics used for evaluation. Mode 3 superseded both modes 1 and 2, meaning that surgeons prefer to see a 3D model along with a standardized report to plan a case’s surgical intervention. Mode 1 superseded mode 2, which also shows surgeons preference to inspect a 3D model rather than inspecting cases the conventional way. Surgeons’ agreement in opinions across cases in mode 3 was 85%, whereas it was 18% and 5% in mode 1 and mode 2, respectively. This shows that information was conveyed more consistently across surgeons in mode 3. NASA TLX tests show that surgeons had the least cognitive load while working with mode 3, followed by mode 1 and then mode 2. Overall, the findings indicate that 3D models, even without radiologists’ written input, outperform the current standard practice of delivering unstructured radiology reports alongside raw PACS images.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01524-4" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01524-4</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_4d7ef42a5300abdf21a8ef51297c7de5
identifier_str_mv 10.1007/s10278-025-01524-4
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/30454304
publishDate 2025
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal FistulasSarra Kharbech (22501886)Nabil Sherif Mahmood (22501889)Ma’mon Qasem (22224901)Julien Abinahed (14151792)Amal Alobadli (22501892)Mohamed Abunada (22501895)Omar Aboumarzouk (18427923)Abdulla Al Ansari (14058060)Shidin Balakrishnan (14150580)Nikhil Navkar (14151798)Adham Darweesh (22501898)Biomedical and clinical sciencesClinical sciencesOncology and carcinogenesisHealth sciencesHealth services and systemsPerianal fistulaSurgical planningMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Three-dimensional (3D) visualization<p dir="ltr">Perianal fistula is a complex condition where surgeons conduct surgeries based on the mentally mapped images they created from the information found in the radiology report. If not properly treated, a fistula could reoccur. To reduce the chances of reoccurrence, a patient-specific, visual, and accurate depiction of the internal tracts in relation to the pelvic floor is required. A three-dimensional (3D) parametric model generation software was previously developed and evaluated successfully with radiologists. In this paper, the software output is evaluated with two colorectal surgeons for 10 fistula cases. The paper compares three reporting different modes: (1) 3D models only, (2) conventional radiology report and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) magnetic resonance (MR) images, and (3) 3D models + standardized radiology report. The percentage of agreement between surgeons across cases and cognitive load are the primary metrics used for evaluation. Mode 3 superseded both modes 1 and 2, meaning that surgeons prefer to see a 3D model along with a standardized report to plan a case’s surgical intervention. Mode 1 superseded mode 2, which also shows surgeons preference to inspect a 3D model rather than inspecting cases the conventional way. Surgeons’ agreement in opinions across cases in mode 3 was 85%, whereas it was 18% and 5% in mode 1 and mode 2, respectively. This shows that information was conveyed more consistently across surgeons in mode 3. NASA TLX tests show that surgeons had the least cognitive load while working with mode 3, followed by mode 1 and then mode 2. Overall, the findings indicate that 3D models, even without radiologists’ written input, outperform the current standard practice of delivering unstructured radiology reports alongside raw PACS images.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01524-4" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01524-4</a></p>2025-05-13T09:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1007/s10278-025-01524-4https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Evaluation_of_Reporting_Methods_for_Assessment_and_Surgical_Planning_of_Perianal_Fistulas/30454304CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/304543042025-05-13T09:00:00Z
spellingShingle Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal Fistulas
Sarra Kharbech (22501886)
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Health sciences
Health services and systems
Perianal fistula
Surgical planning
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Three-dimensional (3D) visualization
status_str publishedVersion
title Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal Fistulas
title_full Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal Fistulas
title_fullStr Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal Fistulas
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal Fistulas
title_short Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal Fistulas
title_sort Evaluation of Reporting Methods for Assessment and Surgical Planning of Perianal Fistulas
topic Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Health sciences
Health services and systems
Perianal fistula
Surgical planning
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Three-dimensional (3D) visualization