Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge Ethics

<p dir="ltr">This article addresses the question of the Muslim umma (the universal community of Muslims) which arises within the context of the ongoing debates about the status of refugees and their rights around the world, especially in the Muslim world, where a significant majority...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Mohammed Hossameldeen (17307647) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Jureidini R. Ray (17307650) (author)
منشور في: 2022
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513546381950976
author Mohammed Hossameldeen (17307647)
author2 Jureidini R. Ray (17307650)
author2_role author
author_facet Mohammed Hossameldeen (17307647)
Jureidini R. Ray (17307650)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mohammed Hossameldeen (17307647)
Jureidini R. Ray (17307650)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-05T00:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1186/s41018-022-00124-z
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Umma_and_the_Nation-State_Dilemmas_in_Refuge_Ethics/24420034
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Human society
Development studies
Policy and administration
Political science
Philosophy and religious studies
Applied ethics
Nation-state
Umma
Refugee-policy
Islamic ethics
Zakat
Forced migration
Refugees
Asylum
Border policies
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge Ethics
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <p dir="ltr">This article addresses the question of the Muslim umma (the universal community of Muslims) which arises within the context of the ongoing debates about the status of refugees and their rights around the world, especially in the Muslim world, where a significant majority of migrants and refugees originate and are hosted. We question the existence of the Muslim umma under contemporary circumstances and discuss the extent to which the modern nation-state has undermined the principles of Muslim unity and solidarity beyond national borders. We also examine how Islamic ethics and law (fiqh) identify the imperatives of providing comfort and protection for refugees (whether they are Muslim or non-Muslim) individuals, groups, and communities when required or requested. We see this in principle, but not always in practice. Are refugee policies applied by Muslim-majority countries today in accordance with the fundamental Islamic teachings and experiences of the original hijra? Or have such principles been made redundant by the political-geographic imperatives of ethnicized nation-states? To what extent can applied policies in Muslim-majority countries be developed and enhanced in the light of umma principles that might alleviate the longstanding refugee crises in this troubled area of the world?</p><p dir="ltr">The article consists of three main sections. The first provides a theoretical and religious analysis of the idea of the umma as an inclusive entity that encompasses all Muslims, contrasted with the modern nation-state as an exclusive geographically defined political institution. The second looks at three Muslim-majority countries that played a significant hosting role in refugee crises over the past decade, namely Jordan, Bangladesh, and Turkey. We offer some insight in understanding to what extent their policies or behavior were based upon ummatic principles, or secularist notions of national interest and humanitarian aid? The last section summarizes the recent innovation providing for Muslim refugees through a UNHCR arrangement and adaptation with the Islamic charitable obligation of Zakat. It is suggested that the UNHCR Zakat Fund is an ummatic manifestation that has already proved honorable and viable. The conclusion calls for a better understanding of the umma as it is in the Islamic consciousness towards an effective reforming of refugee policies and practices, suggesting a further enhancement of ummatic institutional collaboration between the OIC and UNHCR for refugee integration.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Journal of International Humanitarian Action<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-022-00124-z" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-022-00124-z</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_4f89b8038c9353c7ced86540f69090a4
identifier_str_mv 10.1186/s41018-022-00124-z
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/24420034
publishDate 2022
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge EthicsMohammed Hossameldeen (17307647)Jureidini R. Ray (17307650)Human societyDevelopment studiesPolicy and administrationPolitical sciencePhilosophy and religious studiesApplied ethicsNation-stateUmmaRefugee-policyIslamic ethicsZakatForced migrationRefugeesAsylumBorder policies<p dir="ltr">This article addresses the question of the Muslim umma (the universal community of Muslims) which arises within the context of the ongoing debates about the status of refugees and their rights around the world, especially in the Muslim world, where a significant majority of migrants and refugees originate and are hosted. We question the existence of the Muslim umma under contemporary circumstances and discuss the extent to which the modern nation-state has undermined the principles of Muslim unity and solidarity beyond national borders. We also examine how Islamic ethics and law (fiqh) identify the imperatives of providing comfort and protection for refugees (whether they are Muslim or non-Muslim) individuals, groups, and communities when required or requested. We see this in principle, but not always in practice. Are refugee policies applied by Muslim-majority countries today in accordance with the fundamental Islamic teachings and experiences of the original hijra? Or have such principles been made redundant by the political-geographic imperatives of ethnicized nation-states? To what extent can applied policies in Muslim-majority countries be developed and enhanced in the light of umma principles that might alleviate the longstanding refugee crises in this troubled area of the world?</p><p dir="ltr">The article consists of three main sections. The first provides a theoretical and religious analysis of the idea of the umma as an inclusive entity that encompasses all Muslims, contrasted with the modern nation-state as an exclusive geographically defined political institution. The second looks at three Muslim-majority countries that played a significant hosting role in refugee crises over the past decade, namely Jordan, Bangladesh, and Turkey. We offer some insight in understanding to what extent their policies or behavior were based upon ummatic principles, or secularist notions of national interest and humanitarian aid? The last section summarizes the recent innovation providing for Muslim refugees through a UNHCR arrangement and adaptation with the Islamic charitable obligation of Zakat. It is suggested that the UNHCR Zakat Fund is an ummatic manifestation that has already proved honorable and viable. The conclusion calls for a better understanding of the umma as it is in the Islamic consciousness towards an effective reforming of refugee policies and practices, suggesting a further enhancement of ummatic institutional collaboration between the OIC and UNHCR for refugee integration.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Journal of International Humanitarian Action<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-022-00124-z" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-022-00124-z</a></p>2022-08-05T00:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1186/s41018-022-00124-zhttps://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Umma_and_the_Nation-State_Dilemmas_in_Refuge_Ethics/24420034CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/244200342022-08-05T00:00:00Z
spellingShingle Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge Ethics
Mohammed Hossameldeen (17307647)
Human society
Development studies
Policy and administration
Political science
Philosophy and religious studies
Applied ethics
Nation-state
Umma
Refugee-policy
Islamic ethics
Zakat
Forced migration
Refugees
Asylum
Border policies
status_str publishedVersion
title Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge Ethics
title_full Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge Ethics
title_fullStr Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge Ethics
title_full_unstemmed Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge Ethics
title_short Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge Ethics
title_sort Umma and the Nation-State: Dilemmas in Refuge Ethics
topic Human society
Development studies
Policy and administration
Political science
Philosophy and religious studies
Applied ethics
Nation-state
Umma
Refugee-policy
Islamic ethics
Zakat
Forced migration
Refugees
Asylum
Border policies