Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research

<p dir="ltr">Assessment of internal validity safeguards implemented by researchers has been used to examine the potential reliability of evidence generated within a study. These safeguards protect against systematic error, and such an assessment has traditionally been called a <i&...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Luis Furuya-Kanamori (477124) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Chang Xu (102022) (author), Syed Shahzad Hasan (5587691) (author), Suhail A. Doi (9552474) (author)
منشور في: 2021
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513559433576448
author Luis Furuya-Kanamori (477124)
author2 Chang Xu (102022)
Syed Shahzad Hasan (5587691)
Suhail A. Doi (9552474)
author2_role author
author
author
author_facet Luis Furuya-Kanamori (477124)
Chang Xu (102022)
Syed Shahzad Hasan (5587691)
Suhail A. Doi (9552474)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Luis Furuya-Kanamori (477124)
Chang Xu (102022)
Syed Shahzad Hasan (5587691)
Suhail A. Doi (9552474)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Quality_versus_Risk-of-Bias_assessment_in_clinical_research/24210684
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Health sciences
Epidemiology
Health services and systems
Bias assessment
Risk of bias
Quality assessment
Internal validity
systematic error
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <p dir="ltr">Assessment of internal validity safeguards implemented by researchers has been used to examine the potential reliability of evidence generated within a study. These safeguards protect against systematic error, and such an assessment has traditionally been called a <i>quality assessment</i>. When the results of a quality assessment are translated through some empirical construct to the potential risk of bias, this has been termed a <i>risk of bias assessment</i>. The latter has gained popularity and is commonly used interchangeably with the term <i>quality assessment</i>. This key concept paper clarifies the differences between these assessments and how they may be used and interpreted when assessing clinical evidence for internal validity.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_5168d29f6adf6c9de6e63cea1c476f12
identifier_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/24210684
publishDate 2021
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical researchLuis Furuya-Kanamori (477124)Chang Xu (102022)Syed Shahzad Hasan (5587691)Suhail A. Doi (9552474)Biomedical and clinical sciencesClinical sciencesHealth sciencesEpidemiologyHealth services and systemsBias assessmentRisk of biasQuality assessmentInternal validitysystematic error<p dir="ltr">Assessment of internal validity safeguards implemented by researchers has been used to examine the potential reliability of evidence generated within a study. These safeguards protect against systematic error, and such an assessment has traditionally been called a <i>quality assessment</i>. When the results of a quality assessment are translated through some empirical construct to the potential risk of bias, this has been termed a <i>risk of bias assessment</i>. The latter has gained popularity and is commonly used interchangeably with the term <i>quality assessment</i>. This key concept paper clarifies the differences between these assessments and how they may be used and interpreted when assessing clinical evidence for internal validity.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044</a></p>2021-01-01T00:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Quality_versus_Risk-of-Bias_assessment_in_clinical_research/24210684CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/242106842021-01-01T00:00:00Z
spellingShingle Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research
Luis Furuya-Kanamori (477124)
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Health sciences
Epidemiology
Health services and systems
Bias assessment
Risk of bias
Quality assessment
Internal validity
systematic error
status_str publishedVersion
title Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research
title_full Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research
title_fullStr Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research
title_full_unstemmed Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research
title_short Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research
title_sort Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research
topic Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Health sciences
Epidemiology
Health services and systems
Bias assessment
Risk of bias
Quality assessment
Internal validity
systematic error