Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law

<p dir="ltr">This article reconceptualizes norm conflict in international law by uncovering the experiential dimension of its definition and the intentional dimension of its resolution that has been missing from traditional accounts. The article locates the basis of recognizing norm...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Ka Lok YIP (19160611) (author)
منشور في: 2024
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513510781747200
author Ka Lok YIP (19160611)
author_facet Ka Lok YIP (19160611)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ka Lok YIP (19160611)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-11T09:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1017/s2044251324000031
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Reconceptualizing_Norm_Conflict_in_International_Law/26316880
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Law and legal studies
International and comparative law
Legal systems
norm conflict
definition norm
conflict resolution
jus ad bellum
jus in bello
hegemony
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <p dir="ltr">This article reconceptualizes norm conflict in international law by uncovering the experiential dimension of its definition and the intentional dimension of its resolution that has been missing from traditional accounts. The article locates the basis of recognizing norm conflict in the experienced sense of incompatibility between norms in view of their contexts rather than in the predesignated constellation of norms with contrary or contradictory functions according to their texts. Concomitantly, it argues that the justification for using certain legal techniques to resolve norm conflicts lies in the intended relationship deducible only between those norms that share the same regulatory purpose rather than between norms merely applying to the same factual situation. This reconceptualization generates a new typology of norm conflicts in light of the norms’ end goals and the means they provide to achieve them: “Ends Conflict”, “Means Conflict”, and “Unexperienced Conflict”, and suggests apposite ways to tackle them.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Asian Journal of International Law<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2044251324000031" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2044251324000031</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_5803d07c34cefdeec73321c2c68cd4bf
identifier_str_mv 10.1017/s2044251324000031
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/26316880
publishDate 2024
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International LawKa Lok YIP (19160611)Law and legal studiesInternational and comparative lawLegal systemsnorm conflictdefinition normconflict resolutionjus ad bellumjus in bellohegemony<p dir="ltr">This article reconceptualizes norm conflict in international law by uncovering the experiential dimension of its definition and the intentional dimension of its resolution that has been missing from traditional accounts. The article locates the basis of recognizing norm conflict in the experienced sense of incompatibility between norms in view of their contexts rather than in the predesignated constellation of norms with contrary or contradictory functions according to their texts. Concomitantly, it argues that the justification for using certain legal techniques to resolve norm conflicts lies in the intended relationship deducible only between those norms that share the same regulatory purpose rather than between norms merely applying to the same factual situation. This reconceptualization generates a new typology of norm conflicts in light of the norms’ end goals and the means they provide to achieve them: “Ends Conflict”, “Means Conflict”, and “Unexperienced Conflict”, and suggests apposite ways to tackle them.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Asian Journal of International Law<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2044251324000031" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2044251324000031</a></p>2024-04-11T09:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1017/s2044251324000031https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Reconceptualizing_Norm_Conflict_in_International_Law/26316880CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/263168802024-04-11T09:00:00Z
spellingShingle Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law
Ka Lok YIP (19160611)
Law and legal studies
International and comparative law
Legal systems
norm conflict
definition norm
conflict resolution
jus ad bellum
jus in bello
hegemony
status_str publishedVersion
title Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law
title_full Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law
title_fullStr Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law
title_full_unstemmed Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law
title_short Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law
title_sort Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law
topic Law and legal studies
International and comparative law
Legal systems
norm conflict
definition norm
conflict resolution
jus ad bellum
jus in bello
hegemony