Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

<h3>Introduction</h3><p dir="ltr">Despite recent advances in clinical therapeutics in patients with venous thromboembolism, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal anticoagulation strategy in patients with intermediate‐ to high‐risk pulmonary embolism. We aimed to evalu...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Mohamed Nabil Elshafei (9960500) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Muhammad Salem (8979428) (author), Mutasem Almistarihi (22564736) (author), Haider Alabd (22564739) (author), Ahmed Khalil (2132113) (author), Mohammed Danjuma (9960506) (author)
منشور في: 2025
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513533211836416
author Mohamed Nabil Elshafei (9960500)
author2 Muhammad Salem (8979428)
Mutasem Almistarihi (22564736)
Haider Alabd (22564739)
Ahmed Khalil (2132113)
Mohammed Danjuma (9960506)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Mohamed Nabil Elshafei (9960500)
Muhammad Salem (8979428)
Mutasem Almistarihi (22564736)
Haider Alabd (22564739)
Ahmed Khalil (2132113)
Mohammed Danjuma (9960506)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mohamed Nabil Elshafei (9960500)
Muhammad Salem (8979428)
Mutasem Almistarihi (22564736)
Haider Alabd (22564739)
Ahmed Khalil (2132113)
Mohammed Danjuma (9960506)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-06T03:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1002/jha2.70031
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Direct_Oral_Anticoagulants_Compared_to_Warfarin_in_Patients_with_Intermediate_to_High_Risk_Pulmonary_Embolism_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta_Analysis/30540794
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomedical and clinical sciences
Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
Clinical sciences
Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences
DOAC
high-risk
intermediate-risk
meta-analysis
warfarin
pulmonary embolism
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <h3>Introduction</h3><p dir="ltr">Despite recent advances in clinical therapeutics in patients with venous thromboembolism, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal anticoagulation strategy in patients with intermediate‐ to high‐risk pulmonary embolism. We aimed to evaluate the direct oral anticoagulants’ effectiveness and safety compared to warfarin in patients with intermediate‐ and high‐risk pulmonary embolism.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p dir="ltr">In this meta‐analysis, we systematically searched databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to April 30, 2024, for eligible studies that satisfy inclusion criteria. We included both randomized clinical trials and observational studies reporting on patients diagnosed with intermediate‐risk or high‐risk pulmonary embolism who were prescribed warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban). Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data from included studies based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guideline. Pooled odds ratios were derived from the included studies using the random‐effects model. The primary outcomes were the rate of venous thromboembolism recurrence and all‐cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were major and minor bleeding.</p><h3>Results</h3><p dir="ltr">Six studies, five observational and one randomized (n = 553 patients, out of which 45.7% received advanced therapy), were included in our meta‐analysis. Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with comparable recurrence and mortality rates versus warfarin (odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15–3.43) and (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.16–2.01), respectively. There was no significant difference in the safety outcomes (major and minor bleeding events), with a trend towards a decreased risk among direct oral anticoagulant treated cohorts (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.08–1.1) and (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.24–1.7), respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p dir="ltr">In patients with intermediate‐ to high‐risk pulmonary embolism, with or without advanced therapy use, stabilized on direct oral anticoagulants, efficacy and safety outcomes were comparable to those on warfarin, with a trend towards less risk of major and minor bleeding events.</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p dir="ltr">International PROSPERO database number: CRD42024499532</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: eJHaem<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.70031" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.70031</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_58fd5051b3e13540740429af20fa55ee
identifier_str_mv 10.1002/jha2.70031
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/30540794
publishDate 2025
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisMohamed Nabil Elshafei (9960500)Muhammad Salem (8979428)Mutasem Almistarihi (22564736)Haider Alabd (22564739)Ahmed Khalil (2132113)Mohammed Danjuma (9960506)Biomedical and clinical sciencesCardiovascular medicine and haematologyClinical sciencesPharmacology and pharmaceutical sciencesDOAChigh-riskintermediate-riskmeta-analysiswarfarinpulmonary embolism<h3>Introduction</h3><p dir="ltr">Despite recent advances in clinical therapeutics in patients with venous thromboembolism, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal anticoagulation strategy in patients with intermediate‐ to high‐risk pulmonary embolism. We aimed to evaluate the direct oral anticoagulants’ effectiveness and safety compared to warfarin in patients with intermediate‐ and high‐risk pulmonary embolism.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p dir="ltr">In this meta‐analysis, we systematically searched databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to April 30, 2024, for eligible studies that satisfy inclusion criteria. We included both randomized clinical trials and observational studies reporting on patients diagnosed with intermediate‐risk or high‐risk pulmonary embolism who were prescribed warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban). Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data from included studies based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guideline. Pooled odds ratios were derived from the included studies using the random‐effects model. The primary outcomes were the rate of venous thromboembolism recurrence and all‐cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were major and minor bleeding.</p><h3>Results</h3><p dir="ltr">Six studies, five observational and one randomized (n = 553 patients, out of which 45.7% received advanced therapy), were included in our meta‐analysis. Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with comparable recurrence and mortality rates versus warfarin (odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15–3.43) and (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.16–2.01), respectively. There was no significant difference in the safety outcomes (major and minor bleeding events), with a trend towards a decreased risk among direct oral anticoagulant treated cohorts (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.08–1.1) and (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.24–1.7), respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p dir="ltr">In patients with intermediate‐ to high‐risk pulmonary embolism, with or without advanced therapy use, stabilized on direct oral anticoagulants, efficacy and safety outcomes were comparable to those on warfarin, with a trend towards less risk of major and minor bleeding events.</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p dir="ltr">International PROSPERO database number: CRD42024499532</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: eJHaem<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.70031" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.70031</a></p>2025-06-06T03:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1002/jha2.70031https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Direct_Oral_Anticoagulants_Compared_to_Warfarin_in_Patients_with_Intermediate_to_High_Risk_Pulmonary_Embolism_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta_Analysis/30540794CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/305407942025-06-06T03:00:00Z
spellingShingle Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Mohamed Nabil Elshafei (9960500)
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
Clinical sciences
Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences
DOAC
high-risk
intermediate-risk
meta-analysis
warfarin
pulmonary embolism
status_str publishedVersion
title Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate‐ to High‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
topic Biomedical and clinical sciences
Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
Clinical sciences
Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences
DOAC
high-risk
intermediate-risk
meta-analysis
warfarin
pulmonary embolism