Stochastic Programming for Hub Energy Management Considering Uncertainty Using Two-Point Estimate Method and Optimization Algorithm
<p dir="ltr">To maximize energy profit with the participation of electricity, natural gas, and district heating networks in the day-ahead market, stochastic scheduling of energy hubs taking into account the uncertainty of photovoltaic and wind resources, has been carried out. This ha...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | , , , , , |
| منشور في: |
2023
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| الملخص: | <p dir="ltr">To maximize energy profit with the participation of electricity, natural gas, and district heating networks in the day-ahead market, stochastic scheduling of energy hubs taking into account the uncertainty of photovoltaic and wind resources, has been carried out. This has been done using a new meta-heuristic algorithm, improved artificial rabbits optimization (IARO). In this study, the uncertainty of solar and wind energy sources is modeled using Hang’s two-point estimating method (TPEM). The IARO algorithm is applied to calculate the best capacity of hub energy equipment, such as solar and wind renewable energy sources, combined heat and power (CHP) systems, steam boilers, energy storage, and electric cars in the day-ahead market. The standard ARO algorithm is developed to mimic the foraging behavior of rabbits, and in this work, the algorithm’s effectiveness in avoiding premature convergence is improved by using the dystudynamic inertia weight technique. The proposed IARO-based scheduling framework’s performance is evaluated against that of traditional ARO, particle swarm optimization (PSO), and salp swarm algorithm (SSA). The findings show that, in comparison to previous approaches, the suggested meta-heuristic scheduling framework based on the IARO has increased energy profit in day-ahead electricity, gas, and heating markets by satisfying the operational and energy hub limitations. Additionally, the results show that TPEM approach dependability consideration decreased hub energy’s profit by 8.995% as compared to deterministic planning.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a> <br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.029453" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.029453</a></p> |
|---|