Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i>
<p dir="ltr">In <i>The Dawn of Everything</i><b>,</b> David Graeber and David Wengrow suggest that almost all modern features of social structures—for example, cities, religious rituals, kingships, accounting practices, rational arguments, and private property...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| منشور في: |
2025
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| _version_ | 1864513545967763456 |
|---|---|
| author | Elias L. Khalil (20518877) |
| author_facet | Elias L. Khalil (20518877) |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Elias L. Khalil (20518877) |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2025-06-11T00:00:00Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 10.1111/taja.70012 |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Does_the_state_usher_in_a_special_stage_in_history_Probing_i_the_Dawn_of_Everything_A_new_history_of_humanity_i_/29310662 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | History, heritage and archaeology Archaeology Historical studies Human society Anthropology Political science Sociology Indigenous studies Other Indigenous studies Giorgio Agamben Franz Steiner Oppression Rectilinear, historicist, and universalist historiographies Schismogenesis Slavery Social evolutionary theories |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i> |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Text Journal contribution info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text contribution to journal |
| description | <p dir="ltr">In <i>The Dawn of Everything</i><b>,</b> David Graeber and David Wengrow suggest that almost all modern features of social structures—for example, cities, religious rituals, kingships, accounting practices, rational arguments, and private property—date to epochs prior to the neolithic revolution. They effectively question the characterisation of the introduction of agriculture as a ‘revolution’. This paper distils Graeber and Wengrow’s contribution into two core theses. First, all social structures are underpinned by a common and universal consciousness based on the quest for both freedom and identity—which explains the continuity of the same basic consciousness throughout history. This effectively undermines stadial evolutionary theories. Second, the state, starting with the Pharaoh’s civilisation, ushers in a special stage in history, as it suppresses various cherished freedoms. While this paper welcomes Graeber and Wengrow’s first thesis, it finds the second thesis to be problematic. The suppression of freedom occurs also in pre-Pharaoh social structures. Of more importance, their second thesis advances a stadial theory, which is inconsistent with the first thesis. This paper puts forward an alternative account of the state based on Franz Steiner’s theory of slavery. While Graeber and Wengrow highly commend Steiner’s theory, they are not cognisant of the fact that it challenges their second thesis.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Australian Journal of Anthropology<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.70012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.70012</a></p> |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| id | Manara2_756b57be5369289205cd28ca30506e39 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.1111/taja.70012 |
| network_acronym_str | Manara2 |
| network_name_str | Manara2 |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:figshare.com:article/29310662 |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 |
| spelling | Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i>Elias L. Khalil (20518877)History, heritage and archaeologyArchaeologyHistorical studiesHuman societyAnthropologyPolitical scienceSociologyIndigenous studiesOther Indigenous studiesGiorgio AgambenFranz SteinerOppressionRectilinear, historicist, and universalist historiographiesSchismogenesisSlaverySocial evolutionary theories<p dir="ltr">In <i>The Dawn of Everything</i><b>,</b> David Graeber and David Wengrow suggest that almost all modern features of social structures—for example, cities, religious rituals, kingships, accounting practices, rational arguments, and private property—date to epochs prior to the neolithic revolution. They effectively question the characterisation of the introduction of agriculture as a ‘revolution’. This paper distils Graeber and Wengrow’s contribution into two core theses. First, all social structures are underpinned by a common and universal consciousness based on the quest for both freedom and identity—which explains the continuity of the same basic consciousness throughout history. This effectively undermines stadial evolutionary theories. Second, the state, starting with the Pharaoh’s civilisation, ushers in a special stage in history, as it suppresses various cherished freedoms. While this paper welcomes Graeber and Wengrow’s first thesis, it finds the second thesis to be problematic. The suppression of freedom occurs also in pre-Pharaoh social structures. Of more importance, their second thesis advances a stadial theory, which is inconsistent with the first thesis. This paper puts forward an alternative account of the state based on Franz Steiner’s theory of slavery. While Graeber and Wengrow highly commend Steiner’s theory, they are not cognisant of the fact that it challenges their second thesis.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Australian Journal of Anthropology<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.70012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.70012</a></p>2025-06-11T00:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1111/taja.70012https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Does_the_state_usher_in_a_special_stage_in_history_Probing_i_the_Dawn_of_Everything_A_new_history_of_humanity_i_/29310662CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/293106622025-06-11T00:00:00Z |
| spellingShingle | Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i> Elias L. Khalil (20518877) History, heritage and archaeology Archaeology Historical studies Human society Anthropology Political science Sociology Indigenous studies Other Indigenous studies Giorgio Agamben Franz Steiner Oppression Rectilinear, historicist, and universalist historiographies Schismogenesis Slavery Social evolutionary theories |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i> |
| title_full | Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i> |
| title_fullStr | Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i> |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i> |
| title_short | Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i> |
| title_sort | Does the state usher in a special stage in history? Probing <i>the Dawn of Everything: A new history of humanity</i> |
| topic | History, heritage and archaeology Archaeology Historical studies Human society Anthropology Political science Sociology Indigenous studies Other Indigenous studies Giorgio Agamben Franz Steiner Oppression Rectilinear, historicist, and universalist historiographies Schismogenesis Slavery Social evolutionary theories |