Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests
<p>There has been a move towards a criterion-based return to play in recent years, with 4 single-leg hop tests commonly used to assess functional performance. Despite their widespread integration, research indicates that relationships between ‘passing’ ‘hop test criteria and successful outcome...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | , |
| منشور في: |
2022
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| _version_ | 1864513567128027136 |
|---|---|
| author | William T. Davies (14152224) |
| author2 | Gregory D. Myer (3150879) Paul J. Read (12028469) |
| author2_role | author author |
| author_facet | William T. Davies (14152224) Gregory D. Myer (3150879) Paul J. Read (12028469) |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | William T. Davies (14152224) Gregory D. Myer (3150879) Paul J. Read (12028469) |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2022-11-22T21:15:43Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 10.1007/s40279-019-01221-7 |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Is_It_Time_We_Better_Understood_the_Tests_We_are_Using_for_Return_to_Sport_Decision_Making_Following_ACL_Reconstruction_A_Critical_Review_of_the_Hop_Tests/21597822 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Biomedical and clinical sciences Clinical sciences Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Orthopedics and Sports Medicine |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Text Journal contribution info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text contribution to journal |
| description | <p>There has been a move towards a criterion-based return to play in recent years, with 4 single-leg hop tests commonly used to assess functional performance. Despite their widespread integration, research indicates that relationships between ‘passing’ ‘hop test criteria and successful outcomes following rehabilitation are equivocal, and, therefore, require further investigation. This critical review includes key information to examine the evolution of these tests, their reliability, relationships with other constructs, and sensitivity to change over time. Recommendations for how measurement and administration of the tests can be improved are also discussed. The evidence presented in this review shows that hop tests display good reliability and are sensitive to change over time. However, the use of more than 2 hop tests does not appear to be necessary due to high collinearity and no greater sensitivity to detect abnormality. The inclusion of other hop tests in different planes may give greater information about the current function of the knee, particularly when measured over time using both relative and absolute measures of performance. It is recommended that the contralateral limb be tested prior to surgery for a more relevant benchmark for performance, and clinicians are strongly advised to measure movement quality, as hop distance alone appears to overestimate the recovery of the knee.</p><h2>Other Information</h2> <p> Published in: Sports Medicine<br> License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01221-7" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01221-7</a></p> |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| id | Manara2_7e20c13e66c04737a898cbf57d3146f2 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.1007/s40279-019-01221-7 |
| network_acronym_str | Manara2 |
| network_name_str | Manara2 |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:figshare.com:article/21597822 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 |
| spelling | Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop TestsWilliam T. Davies (14152224)Gregory D. Myer (3150879)Paul J. Read (12028469)Biomedical and clinical sciencesClinical sciencesPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationOrthopedics and Sports Medicine<p>There has been a move towards a criterion-based return to play in recent years, with 4 single-leg hop tests commonly used to assess functional performance. Despite their widespread integration, research indicates that relationships between ‘passing’ ‘hop test criteria and successful outcomes following rehabilitation are equivocal, and, therefore, require further investigation. This critical review includes key information to examine the evolution of these tests, their reliability, relationships with other constructs, and sensitivity to change over time. Recommendations for how measurement and administration of the tests can be improved are also discussed. The evidence presented in this review shows that hop tests display good reliability and are sensitive to change over time. However, the use of more than 2 hop tests does not appear to be necessary due to high collinearity and no greater sensitivity to detect abnormality. The inclusion of other hop tests in different planes may give greater information about the current function of the knee, particularly when measured over time using both relative and absolute measures of performance. It is recommended that the contralateral limb be tested prior to surgery for a more relevant benchmark for performance, and clinicians are strongly advised to measure movement quality, as hop distance alone appears to overestimate the recovery of the knee.</p><h2>Other Information</h2> <p> Published in: Sports Medicine<br> License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01221-7" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01221-7</a></p>2022-11-22T21:15:43ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1007/s40279-019-01221-7https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Is_It_Time_We_Better_Understood_the_Tests_We_are_Using_for_Return_to_Sport_Decision_Making_Following_ACL_Reconstruction_A_Critical_Review_of_the_Hop_Tests/21597822CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/215978222022-11-22T21:15:43Z |
| spellingShingle | Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests William T. Davies (14152224) Biomedical and clinical sciences Clinical sciences Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Orthopedics and Sports Medicine |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests |
| title_full | Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests |
| title_fullStr | Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests |
| title_full_unstemmed | Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests |
| title_short | Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests |
| title_sort | Is It Time We Better Understood the Tests We are Using for Return to Sport Decision Making Following ACL Reconstruction? A Critical Review of the Hop Tests |
| topic | Biomedical and clinical sciences Clinical sciences Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Orthopedics and Sports Medicine |