Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional study

<h3>Background</h3><p dir="ltr">Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is well‐established and designed to evaluate students' clinical competence and practical skills in a standardized and objective manner. While OSCEs are widespread in higher‐income countr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Asma Ben Amor (17300908) (author)
Other Authors: Hassan Farhat (9000509) (author), Guillaume Alinier (6952004) (author), Amina Ounallah (18508007) (author), Olfa Bouallegue (18508008) (author)
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1864513542675234816
author Asma Ben Amor (17300908)
author2 Hassan Farhat (9000509)
Guillaume Alinier (6952004)
Amina Ounallah (18508007)
Olfa Bouallegue (18508008)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_facet Asma Ben Amor (17300908)
Hassan Farhat (9000509)
Guillaume Alinier (6952004)
Amina Ounallah (18508007)
Olfa Bouallegue (18508008)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Asma Ben Amor (17300908)
Hassan Farhat (9000509)
Guillaume Alinier (6952004)
Amina Ounallah (18508007)
Olfa Bouallegue (18508008)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-13T09:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1002/hsr2.2116
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Evaluation_of_the_implementation_of_the_objective_structured_clinical_examination_in_health_sciences_education_from_a_low_income_context_in_Tunisia_A_cross_sectional_study/29715275
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Education
Curriculum and pedagogy
Education systems
health sciences
low‐resource settings
medical education
objective structured clinical examination
reliability
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional study
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <h3>Background</h3><p dir="ltr">Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is well‐established and designed to evaluate students' clinical competence and practical skills in a standardized and objective manner. While OSCEs are widespread in higher‐income countries, their implementation in low‐resource settings presents unique challenges that warrant further investigation.</p><h3>Aim</h3><p dir="ltr">This study aims to evaluate the perception of the health sciences students and their educators regarding deploying OSCEs within the School of Health Sciences and Techniques of Sousse (SHSTS) in Tunisia and their efficacity in healthcare education compared to traditional practical examination methods.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p dir="ltr">This cross‐sectional study was conducted in June 2022, focusing on final‐year Health Sciences students at the SHSTS in Tunisia. The study participants were students and their educators involved in the OSCEs from June 6th to June 11th, 2022. Anonymous paper‐based 5‐point Likert scale satisfaction surveys were distributed to the students and their educators, with a separate set of questions for each. Spearman, Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> and Krusakll–Wallis tests were utilized to test the differences in satisfaction with the OSCEs among the students and educators. The Wilcoxon Rank test was utilized to examine the differences in students' assessment scores in the OSCEs and the traditional practical examination methods.</p><h3>Results</h3><p dir="ltr">The satisfaction scores were high among health sciences educators and above average for students, with means of 3.82 ± 1.29 and 3.15 ± 0.56, respectively. The bivariate and multivariate analyzes indicated a significant difference in the satisfaction between the students' specialities. Further, a significant difference in their assessment scores distribution in the practical examinations and OSCEs was also demonstrated, with better performance in the OSCEs.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p dir="ltr">Our study provides evidence of the relatively high level of satisfaction with the OSCEs and better performance compared to the traditional practical examinations. These findings advocate for the efficacy of OSCEs in low‐income countries and the need to sustain them.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Health Science Reports<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2116" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2116</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_7f66aaca171750e4bb107c9d6fa34ec5
identifier_str_mv 10.1002/hsr2.2116
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/29715275
publishDate 2024
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional studyAsma Ben Amor (17300908)Hassan Farhat (9000509)Guillaume Alinier (6952004)Amina Ounallah (18508007)Olfa Bouallegue (18508008)Biomedical and clinical sciencesClinical sciencesEducationCurriculum and pedagogyEducation systemshealth scienceslow‐resource settingsmedical educationobjective structured clinical examinationreliability<h3>Background</h3><p dir="ltr">Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is well‐established and designed to evaluate students' clinical competence and practical skills in a standardized and objective manner. While OSCEs are widespread in higher‐income countries, their implementation in low‐resource settings presents unique challenges that warrant further investigation.</p><h3>Aim</h3><p dir="ltr">This study aims to evaluate the perception of the health sciences students and their educators regarding deploying OSCEs within the School of Health Sciences and Techniques of Sousse (SHSTS) in Tunisia and their efficacity in healthcare education compared to traditional practical examination methods.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p dir="ltr">This cross‐sectional study was conducted in June 2022, focusing on final‐year Health Sciences students at the SHSTS in Tunisia. The study participants were students and their educators involved in the OSCEs from June 6th to June 11th, 2022. Anonymous paper‐based 5‐point Likert scale satisfaction surveys were distributed to the students and their educators, with a separate set of questions for each. Spearman, Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> and Krusakll–Wallis tests were utilized to test the differences in satisfaction with the OSCEs among the students and educators. The Wilcoxon Rank test was utilized to examine the differences in students' assessment scores in the OSCEs and the traditional practical examination methods.</p><h3>Results</h3><p dir="ltr">The satisfaction scores were high among health sciences educators and above average for students, with means of 3.82 ± 1.29 and 3.15 ± 0.56, respectively. The bivariate and multivariate analyzes indicated a significant difference in the satisfaction between the students' specialities. Further, a significant difference in their assessment scores distribution in the practical examinations and OSCEs was also demonstrated, with better performance in the OSCEs.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p dir="ltr">Our study provides evidence of the relatively high level of satisfaction with the OSCEs and better performance compared to the traditional practical examinations. These findings advocate for the efficacy of OSCEs in low‐income countries and the need to sustain them.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Health Science Reports<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2116" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2116</a></p>2024-05-13T09:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1002/hsr2.2116https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Evaluation_of_the_implementation_of_the_objective_structured_clinical_examination_in_health_sciences_education_from_a_low_income_context_in_Tunisia_A_cross_sectional_study/29715275CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/297152752024-05-13T09:00:00Z
spellingShingle Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional study
Asma Ben Amor (17300908)
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Education
Curriculum and pedagogy
Education systems
health sciences
low‐resource settings
medical education
objective structured clinical examination
reliability
status_str publishedVersion
title Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional study
title_full Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional study
title_short Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional study
title_sort Evaluation of the implementation of the objective structured clinical examination in health sciences education from a low‐income context in Tunisia: A cross‐sectional study
topic Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Education
Curriculum and pedagogy
Education systems
health sciences
low‐resource settings
medical education
objective structured clinical examination
reliability