On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse rates

<p dir="ltr">Among the greatest challenges facing scholars of public opinion are the potential biases associated with survey item nonresponse and preference falsification. This difficulty has led researchers to utilize nonresponse rates to gauge the degree of preference falsification...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Ammar Shamaileh (5678516) (author)
منشور في: 2024
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513540578082816
author Ammar Shamaileh (5678516)
author_facet Ammar Shamaileh (5678516)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ammar Shamaileh (5678516)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-09-16T09:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1017/psrm.2024.29
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/On_the_measurement_of_preference_falsification_using_nonresponse_rates/30023725
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Human society
Political science
Mathematical sciences
Statistics
survey methodology
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse rates
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <p dir="ltr">Among the greatest challenges facing scholars of public opinion are the potential biases associated with survey item nonresponse and preference falsification. This difficulty has led researchers to utilize nonresponse rates to gauge the degree of preference falsification across regimes. This article addresses the use of survey nonresponse rates to proxy for preference falsification. A simulation analysis exploring the expression of preferences under varying degrees of repression was conducted to examine the viability of using nonresponse rates to regime assessment questions. The simulation demonstrates that nonresponse rates to regime assessment questions and indices based on nonresponse rates are not viable proxies for preference falsification. An empirical examination of survey data supports the results of the simulation analysis.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Political Science Research and Methods<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.29" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.29</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_8526133db9a6864d1bd28aa25172b271
identifier_str_mv 10.1017/psrm.2024.29
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/30023725
publishDate 2024
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse ratesAmmar Shamaileh (5678516)Human societyPolitical scienceMathematical sciencesStatisticssurvey methodology<p dir="ltr">Among the greatest challenges facing scholars of public opinion are the potential biases associated with survey item nonresponse and preference falsification. This difficulty has led researchers to utilize nonresponse rates to gauge the degree of preference falsification across regimes. This article addresses the use of survey nonresponse rates to proxy for preference falsification. A simulation analysis exploring the expression of preferences under varying degrees of repression was conducted to examine the viability of using nonresponse rates to regime assessment questions. The simulation demonstrates that nonresponse rates to regime assessment questions and indices based on nonresponse rates are not viable proxies for preference falsification. An empirical examination of survey data supports the results of the simulation analysis.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Political Science Research and Methods<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.29" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.29</a></p>2024-09-16T09:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1017/psrm.2024.29https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/On_the_measurement_of_preference_falsification_using_nonresponse_rates/30023725CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/300237252024-09-16T09:00:00Z
spellingShingle On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse rates
Ammar Shamaileh (5678516)
Human society
Political science
Mathematical sciences
Statistics
survey methodology
status_str publishedVersion
title On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse rates
title_full On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse rates
title_fullStr On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse rates
title_full_unstemmed On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse rates
title_short On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse rates
title_sort On the measurement of preference falsification using nonresponse rates
topic Human society
Political science
Mathematical sciences
Statistics
survey methodology