Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

<h3>Introduction</h3><p dir="ltr">Refractory priapism, characterized by persistent and prolonged painful erections despite initial treatment maneuvers, can significantly impair erectile function secondary to ischemia-induced corporal tissue fibrosis. These patients will l...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Mohamed Elmarasi (14614276) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Ahmad Alsaeedi (21633611) (author), Ibrahim Elmakaty (14614270) (author), Basel Elsayed (14614273) (author), Ibrahim A Khalil (8673972) (author), Maya Aldeeb (14777215) (author), Kareim Khalafalla (14148807) (author), Khalid Al Kubaisi (21633614) (author), Mohamed Arafa (14058042) (author), Ahmed Majzoub (21633617) (author)
منشور في: 2024
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513545064939520
author Mohamed Elmarasi (14614276)
author2 Ahmad Alsaeedi (21633611)
Ibrahim Elmakaty (14614270)
Basel Elsayed (14614273)
Ibrahim A Khalil (8673972)
Maya Aldeeb (14777215)
Kareim Khalafalla (14148807)
Khalid Al Kubaisi (21633614)
Mohamed Arafa (14058042)
Ahmed Majzoub (21633617)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Mohamed Elmarasi (14614276)
Ahmad Alsaeedi (21633611)
Ibrahim Elmakaty (14614270)
Basel Elsayed (14614273)
Ibrahim A Khalil (8673972)
Maya Aldeeb (14777215)
Kareim Khalafalla (14148807)
Khalid Al Kubaisi (21633614)
Mohamed Arafa (14058042)
Ahmed Majzoub (21633617)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mohamed Elmarasi (14614276)
Ahmad Alsaeedi (21633611)
Ibrahim Elmakaty (14614270)
Basel Elsayed (14614273)
Ibrahim A Khalil (8673972)
Maya Aldeeb (14777215)
Kareim Khalafalla (14148807)
Khalid Al Kubaisi (21633614)
Mohamed Arafa (14058042)
Ahmed Majzoub (21633617)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-11T06:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1093/sxmrev/qeae007
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Early_vs_delayed_insertion_of_penile_prosthesis_in_patients_with_refractory_priapism_a_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis/29446136
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
penile prosthesis
priapism
erectile dysfunction
surgery timing
systematic review
meta-analysis
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <h3>Introduction</h3><p dir="ltr">Refractory priapism, characterized by persistent and prolonged painful erections despite initial treatment maneuvers, can significantly impair erectile function secondary to ischemia-induced corporal tissue fibrosis. These patients will likely require subsequent penile prosthesis (PP) surgery to regain sexual activity, yet consensus regarding the optimal timing of implantation remains lacking.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p dir="ltr">To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes associated with early vs delayed PP implantation in individuals with priapism-induced erectile dysfunction (ED).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p dir="ltr">We included studies that focused on refractory priapism leading to ED and its management with PP implantation. We assessed cohort study bias with a risk-of-bias tool and case series bias with the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by a fixed-effect model.</p><h3>Results</h3><p dir="ltr">We included 9 studies, comprising 4 cohort studies and 5 case series, involving a total of 278 patients. Total complications were higher in the delayed group (OR, 4.16; 95% CI, 2.77-6.26). Fibrosis was significantly more pronounced in the delayed group (OR, 118.18; 95% CI, 20.06-696.32). The odds of erosion, infections, and penile injury did not show statistically significant differences between the groups (OR, 2.52 [95% CI, 0.67-9.49], 0.89 [0.38-2.10], 1.83 [0.79-4.26], respectively). Patients’ satisfaction resulted in a pooled OR of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.04-0.49) in favor of the early PP insertion group.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p dir="ltr">The results from this study favor an early approach to ED (within 30 days) following ischemic priapism. However, it is important to consider patients’ preferences, values, and psychological factors to make an informed decision.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Sexual Medicine Reviews<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae007" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae007</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_a11b917327ce8868b9528fea72df59bc
identifier_str_mv 10.1093/sxmrev/qeae007
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/29446136
publishDate 2024
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysisMohamed Elmarasi (14614276)Ahmad Alsaeedi (21633611)Ibrahim Elmakaty (14614270)Basel Elsayed (14614273)Ibrahim A Khalil (8673972)Maya Aldeeb (14777215)Kareim Khalafalla (14148807)Khalid Al Kubaisi (21633614)Mohamed Arafa (14058042)Ahmed Majzoub (21633617)Biomedical and clinical sciencesClinical sciencespenile prosthesispriapismerectile dysfunctionsurgery timingsystematic reviewmeta-analysis<h3>Introduction</h3><p dir="ltr">Refractory priapism, characterized by persistent and prolonged painful erections despite initial treatment maneuvers, can significantly impair erectile function secondary to ischemia-induced corporal tissue fibrosis. These patients will likely require subsequent penile prosthesis (PP) surgery to regain sexual activity, yet consensus regarding the optimal timing of implantation remains lacking.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p dir="ltr">To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes associated with early vs delayed PP implantation in individuals with priapism-induced erectile dysfunction (ED).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p dir="ltr">We included studies that focused on refractory priapism leading to ED and its management with PP implantation. We assessed cohort study bias with a risk-of-bias tool and case series bias with the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by a fixed-effect model.</p><h3>Results</h3><p dir="ltr">We included 9 studies, comprising 4 cohort studies and 5 case series, involving a total of 278 patients. Total complications were higher in the delayed group (OR, 4.16; 95% CI, 2.77-6.26). Fibrosis was significantly more pronounced in the delayed group (OR, 118.18; 95% CI, 20.06-696.32). The odds of erosion, infections, and penile injury did not show statistically significant differences between the groups (OR, 2.52 [95% CI, 0.67-9.49], 0.89 [0.38-2.10], 1.83 [0.79-4.26], respectively). Patients’ satisfaction resulted in a pooled OR of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.04-0.49) in favor of the early PP insertion group.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p dir="ltr">The results from this study favor an early approach to ED (within 30 days) following ischemic priapism. However, it is important to consider patients’ preferences, values, and psychological factors to make an informed decision.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Sexual Medicine Reviews<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae007" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae007</a></p>2024-03-11T06:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1093/sxmrev/qeae007https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Early_vs_delayed_insertion_of_penile_prosthesis_in_patients_with_refractory_priapism_a_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis/29446136CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/294461362024-03-11T06:00:00Z
spellingShingle Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Mohamed Elmarasi (14614276)
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
penile prosthesis
priapism
erectile dysfunction
surgery timing
systematic review
meta-analysis
status_str publishedVersion
title Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Early vs delayed insertion of penile prosthesis in patients with refractory priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
penile prosthesis
priapism
erectile dysfunction
surgery timing
systematic review
meta-analysis