Estimating protection afforded by prior infection in preventing reinfection: Applying the test-negative study design
<p dir="ltr">The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to use infection testing databases to rapidly estimate effectiveness of prior infection in preventing reinfection (PE<sub>s</sub>) by novel SARS-CoV-2 variants. Mathematical modeling was used to demonstrate a the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | <p dir="ltr">The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to use infection testing databases to rapidly estimate effectiveness of prior infection in preventing reinfection (PE<sub>s</sub>) by novel SARS-CoV-2 variants. Mathematical modeling was used to demonstrate a theoretical foundation for applicability of the test-negative, case-control study design to derive PE<sub>s</sub>. Apart from the very early phase of an epidemic, the difference between the test-negative estimate for PE<sub>s</sub> and true value of PE<sub>s</sub> was minimal and became negligible as the epidemic progressed. The test-negative design provided robust estimation of PE<sub>s</sub> and its waning. Assuming that only 25% of prior infections are documented, misclassification of prior infection status underestimated PE<sub>s</sub>, but the underestimate was considerable only when >50% of the population was ever infected. Misclassification of latent infection, misclassification of current active infection, and scale-up of vaccination all resulted in negligible bias in estimated PE<sub>s</sub>. The test-negative design was applied to national-level testing data in Qatar to estimate PE<sub>s</sub> for SARS-CoV-2. PE<sub>s</sub> against SARS-CoV-2 Alpha and Beta variants was estimated at 97.0% (95% CI: 93.6-98.6) and 85.5% (95% CI: 82.4-88.1), respectively. These estimates were validated using a cohort study design. The test-negative design offers a feasible, robust method to estimate protection from prior infection in preventing reinfection.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: American Journal of Epidemiology<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad239" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad239</a></p> |
|---|