The algorithmic muse and the public domain: Why copyright’s legal philosophy precludes protection for generative AI outputs
<p>Generative AI (GenAI) outputs are not copyrightable. This article argues why. We bypass conventional doctrinal analysis that focuses on black letter law notions of originality and authorship to re-evaluate copyright's foundational philosophy. GenAI fundamentally severs the direct human...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Ezieddin Elmahjub (17788526) (author) |
|---|---|
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and decision-making: Legal & ethical hurdles for implementation in mental health
by: Barry Solaiman (19160614)
Published: (2024) -
Generative AI and the Metaverse: A Scoping Review of Ethical and Legal Challenges
by: Aliya Tabassum (16896486)
Published: (2025) -
Generative AI: a double-edged sword in the cyber threat landscape
by: Werisha Ibrar (21635153)
Published: (2025) -
Global struggle over geographical indications. (c2018)
by: Jurdi, Aline El
Published: (2018) -
Examining Student Teachers’ Agency in an AI-Supported Learning Environment: Q Methodology Research
by: Youmen Chaaban (12307589)
Published: (2025)