Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach

<p>Waste is the most abundant biomass worldwide for renewable energy and value-added products generation. While technologies for the treatment of multiple waste categories continue to evolve, frameworks that facilitate strategic decision-making within bio-economies are required. Therefore, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmed AlNouss (9872265) (author)
Other Authors: Mohammad Alherbawi (14155767) (author), Prakash Parthasarathy (10159511) (author), Naela Al-Thani (19170904) (author), Gordon McKay (1755814) (author), Tareq Al-Ansari (9872268) (author)
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1864513510688423936
author Ahmed AlNouss (9872265)
author2 Mohammad Alherbawi (14155767)
Prakash Parthasarathy (10159511)
Naela Al-Thani (19170904)
Gordon McKay (1755814)
Tareq Al-Ansari (9872268)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Ahmed AlNouss (9872265)
Mohammad Alherbawi (14155767)
Prakash Parthasarathy (10159511)
Naela Al-Thani (19170904)
Gordon McKay (1755814)
Tareq Al-Ansari (9872268)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ahmed AlNouss (9872265)
Mohammad Alherbawi (14155767)
Prakash Parthasarathy (10159511)
Naela Al-Thani (19170904)
Gordon McKay (1755814)
Tareq Al-Ansari (9872268)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-25T18:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108595
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Waste-to-energy_technology_selection_A_multi-criteria_optimisation_approach/26324890
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Engineering
Chemical engineering
Environmental engineering
Environmental sciences
Ecological applications
Liquefaction
Pyrolysis
Gasification
Biochar
Bio-oil
Optimisation
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <p>Waste is the most abundant biomass worldwide for renewable energy and value-added products generation. While technologies for the treatment of multiple waste categories continue to evolve, frameworks that facilitate strategic decision-making within bio-economies are required. Therefore, the aim of this research is to develop a framework that can identify optimal processing route for converting different biomass wastes into valuable products. This study considers five different waste types available in Qatar, including date seed, camel manure, municipal solid waste (MSW), food waste, and sewage sludge. Whereas the investigated technologies include pyrolysis, gasification, and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). The three processes were simulated in Aspen Plus® and evaluated in terms of their technical, environmental, and economic performance for the different selected biomass feedstocks. A two-stage optimisation framework was then developed to identify the optimal processing technology for each biomass considering multiple products generation (i.e., syngas, biochar, and bio-oil). Investigating the waste to energy pathways, the presented model maximised net profit and energy generation while minimised the total associated emissions. The model indicated that gasification is the optimal processing technology to achieve higher economic return. While pyrolysis is recommended for the achievement of highest energy return. Nevertheless, HTL exhibited the best environmental performance with the lowest associated emissions. In addition, various wastes such as MSW and food waste are best processed by gasification to fulfil the environmental and economic criteria, while pyrolysis is more energy efficient in processing these wastes. Whereas HTL has been recommended only for high moisture containing biomass like manure and sludge, demonstrating relatively high energy efficiency, but lower economic return relative to gasification and pyrolysis. The presented optimisation framework may provide insights for decision-makers to optimally valorise waste considering national priorities.</p><h2>Other Information</h2> <p> Published in: Computers & Chemical Engineering<br> License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108595" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108595</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_c88e5857f18c69770f1f15d0b26ea841
identifier_str_mv 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108595
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/26324890
publishDate 2024
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approachAhmed AlNouss (9872265)Mohammad Alherbawi (14155767)Prakash Parthasarathy (10159511)Naela Al-Thani (19170904)Gordon McKay (1755814)Tareq Al-Ansari (9872268)EngineeringChemical engineeringEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental sciencesEcological applicationsLiquefactionPyrolysisGasificationBiocharBio-oilOptimisation<p>Waste is the most abundant biomass worldwide for renewable energy and value-added products generation. While technologies for the treatment of multiple waste categories continue to evolve, frameworks that facilitate strategic decision-making within bio-economies are required. Therefore, the aim of this research is to develop a framework that can identify optimal processing route for converting different biomass wastes into valuable products. This study considers five different waste types available in Qatar, including date seed, camel manure, municipal solid waste (MSW), food waste, and sewage sludge. Whereas the investigated technologies include pyrolysis, gasification, and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). The three processes were simulated in Aspen Plus® and evaluated in terms of their technical, environmental, and economic performance for the different selected biomass feedstocks. A two-stage optimisation framework was then developed to identify the optimal processing technology for each biomass considering multiple products generation (i.e., syngas, biochar, and bio-oil). Investigating the waste to energy pathways, the presented model maximised net profit and energy generation while minimised the total associated emissions. The model indicated that gasification is the optimal processing technology to achieve higher economic return. While pyrolysis is recommended for the achievement of highest energy return. Nevertheless, HTL exhibited the best environmental performance with the lowest associated emissions. In addition, various wastes such as MSW and food waste are best processed by gasification to fulfil the environmental and economic criteria, while pyrolysis is more energy efficient in processing these wastes. Whereas HTL has been recommended only for high moisture containing biomass like manure and sludge, demonstrating relatively high energy efficiency, but lower economic return relative to gasification and pyrolysis. The presented optimisation framework may provide insights for decision-makers to optimally valorise waste considering national priorities.</p><h2>Other Information</h2> <p> Published in: Computers & Chemical Engineering<br> License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108595" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108595</a></p>2024-01-25T18:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108595https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Waste-to-energy_technology_selection_A_multi-criteria_optimisation_approach/26324890CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/263248902024-01-25T18:00:00Z
spellingShingle Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach
Ahmed AlNouss (9872265)
Engineering
Chemical engineering
Environmental engineering
Environmental sciences
Ecological applications
Liquefaction
Pyrolysis
Gasification
Biochar
Bio-oil
Optimisation
status_str publishedVersion
title Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach
title_full Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach
title_fullStr Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach
title_full_unstemmed Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach
title_short Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach
title_sort Waste-to-energy technology selection: A multi-criteria optimisation approach
topic Engineering
Chemical engineering
Environmental engineering
Environmental sciences
Ecological applications
Liquefaction
Pyrolysis
Gasification
Biochar
Bio-oil
Optimisation