Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future Directions

<h3>Background</h3><p dir="ltr">Aphasia has been widely investigated for English and other Indo‐European languages such as German, Dutch, Italian and Spanish. It has been reported that published studies on Arabic aphasia only comprised five studies, accounting for only 0....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tariq Khwaileh (8232351) (author)
Other Authors: Eiman Mustafawi (8232348) (author), Shereen Elbuy (12060044) (author), Noor Numan (22503623) (author), Samawiyah Ulde (22502906) (author)
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1864513533623926784
author Tariq Khwaileh (8232351)
author2 Eiman Mustafawi (8232348)
Shereen Elbuy (12060044)
Noor Numan (22503623)
Samawiyah Ulde (22502906)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_facet Tariq Khwaileh (8232351)
Eiman Mustafawi (8232348)
Shereen Elbuy (12060044)
Noor Numan (22503623)
Samawiyah Ulde (22502906)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tariq Khwaileh (8232351)
Eiman Mustafawi (8232348)
Shereen Elbuy (12060044)
Noor Numan (22503623)
Samawiyah Ulde (22502906)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-16T09:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1111/1460-6984.70064
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Arabic_Aphasia_Research_Through_a_Clinical_and_Linguistic_Lens_A_Systematic_Review_of_Current_Limitations_and_Future_Directions/30455510
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomedical and clinical sciences
Neurosciences
Language, communication and culture
Linguistics
aphasia
cross-linguistic
brain damage
morphology
assessment
speech and language therapy
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future Directions
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <h3>Background</h3><p dir="ltr">Aphasia has been widely investigated for English and other Indo‐European languages such as German, Dutch, Italian and Spanish. It has been reported that published studies on Arabic aphasia only comprised five studies, accounting for only 0.40% of the total literature on aphasia between 2000 and 2009.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p dir="ltr">The present paper is a systematic review of studies that have been published on Arabic aphasia. The main objective of this study is to review the body of aphasia literature on Arabic, to identify strengths and weaknesses in the available clinical resources for Arabic aphasia.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p dir="ltr">Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Five relevant databases were identified and searched using predefined keywords. A 6th source, Google Scholar, was also used to yield grey literature; these sources were screened on Scimago for quality assurance. Predefined eligibility criteria were then applied to the records that the initial search yielded. The final list of included studies was then qualitatively reviewed.</p><h3>Main Contribution</h3><p dir="ltr">The search yielded 48 studies. The resulting review identified a scarcity of research on assessment materials, efficacy of therapy and interventions and linguistic/psycholinguistic theory that underscores the development of clinical resources for Arabic aphasia. It suggested specific areas where development is required in each category. From the available research, it identified limitations in available materials for clinical assessment in Arabic aphasia. Specifically, that currently available materials are (a) primarily translations and adaptations of other languages rather than being developed with linguistically and culturally specific features of Arabic in mind; (b) are screening and short assessments rather than comprehensive batteries and (c) are not controlled for crucial psycholinguistic variables such as imageability and age of acquisition.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p dir="ltr">While research on Arabic aphasia has been growing in the past few years, it lacks in several areas of investigation, including certain methodological approaches, the varieties investigated, aphasia types and the formulation of valid assessment protocols and therapy interventions.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.70064" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.70064</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_c92bedd196d0a3cca3785e9b21b5e5eb
identifier_str_mv 10.1111/1460-6984.70064
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/30455510
publishDate 2025
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future DirectionsTariq Khwaileh (8232351)Eiman Mustafawi (8232348)Shereen Elbuy (12060044)Noor Numan (22503623)Samawiyah Ulde (22502906)Biomedical and clinical sciencesNeurosciencesLanguage, communication and cultureLinguisticsaphasiacross-linguisticbrain damagemorphologyassessmentspeech and language therapy<h3>Background</h3><p dir="ltr">Aphasia has been widely investigated for English and other Indo‐European languages such as German, Dutch, Italian and Spanish. It has been reported that published studies on Arabic aphasia only comprised five studies, accounting for only 0.40% of the total literature on aphasia between 2000 and 2009.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p dir="ltr">The present paper is a systematic review of studies that have been published on Arabic aphasia. The main objective of this study is to review the body of aphasia literature on Arabic, to identify strengths and weaknesses in the available clinical resources for Arabic aphasia.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p dir="ltr">Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Five relevant databases were identified and searched using predefined keywords. A 6th source, Google Scholar, was also used to yield grey literature; these sources were screened on Scimago for quality assurance. Predefined eligibility criteria were then applied to the records that the initial search yielded. The final list of included studies was then qualitatively reviewed.</p><h3>Main Contribution</h3><p dir="ltr">The search yielded 48 studies. The resulting review identified a scarcity of research on assessment materials, efficacy of therapy and interventions and linguistic/psycholinguistic theory that underscores the development of clinical resources for Arabic aphasia. It suggested specific areas where development is required in each category. From the available research, it identified limitations in available materials for clinical assessment in Arabic aphasia. Specifically, that currently available materials are (a) primarily translations and adaptations of other languages rather than being developed with linguistically and culturally specific features of Arabic in mind; (b) are screening and short assessments rather than comprehensive batteries and (c) are not controlled for crucial psycholinguistic variables such as imageability and age of acquisition.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p dir="ltr">While research on Arabic aphasia has been growing in the past few years, it lacks in several areas of investigation, including certain methodological approaches, the varieties investigated, aphasia types and the formulation of valid assessment protocols and therapy interventions.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.70064" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.70064</a></p>2025-06-16T09:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1111/1460-6984.70064https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Arabic_Aphasia_Research_Through_a_Clinical_and_Linguistic_Lens_A_Systematic_Review_of_Current_Limitations_and_Future_Directions/30455510CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/304555102025-06-16T09:00:00Z
spellingShingle Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future Directions
Tariq Khwaileh (8232351)
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Neurosciences
Language, communication and culture
Linguistics
aphasia
cross-linguistic
brain damage
morphology
assessment
speech and language therapy
status_str publishedVersion
title Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future Directions
title_full Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future Directions
title_fullStr Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future Directions
title_full_unstemmed Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future Directions
title_short Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future Directions
title_sort Arabic Aphasia Research Through a Clinical and Linguistic Lens: A Systematic Review of Current Limitations and Future Directions
topic Biomedical and clinical sciences
Neurosciences
Language, communication and culture
Linguistics
aphasia
cross-linguistic
brain damage
morphology
assessment
speech and language therapy