MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update

<p dir="ltr">In evidence synthesis of analytical studies, methodological quality (mQ) assessment is necessary to determine the extent to which internal validity safeguards are implemented in the included studies against a list of selected safeguards in an assessment tool. Such mQ too...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Ashraf I. Ahmed (22045163) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Muhammad Zain Kaleem (18021955) (author), Amgad Mohamed Elshoeibi (17430963) (author), Abdalla Moustafa Elsayed (17807330) (author), Elhassan Mahmoud (22045166) (author), Yaman A. Khamis (22045169) (author), Luis Furuya‐Kanamori (14778820) (author), Jennifer C. Stone (14053092) (author), Suhail A. Doi (9552474) (author)
منشور في: 2024
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513542040846336
author Ashraf I. Ahmed (22045163)
author2 Muhammad Zain Kaleem (18021955)
Amgad Mohamed Elshoeibi (17430963)
Abdalla Moustafa Elsayed (17807330)
Elhassan Mahmoud (22045166)
Yaman A. Khamis (22045169)
Luis Furuya‐Kanamori (14778820)
Jennifer C. Stone (14053092)
Suhail A. Doi (9552474)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Ashraf I. Ahmed (22045163)
Muhammad Zain Kaleem (18021955)
Amgad Mohamed Elshoeibi (17430963)
Abdalla Moustafa Elsayed (17807330)
Elhassan Mahmoud (22045166)
Yaman A. Khamis (22045169)
Luis Furuya‐Kanamori (14778820)
Jennifer C. Stone (14053092)
Suhail A. Doi (9552474)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ashraf I. Ahmed (22045163)
Muhammad Zain Kaleem (18021955)
Amgad Mohamed Elshoeibi (17430963)
Abdalla Moustafa Elsayed (17807330)
Elhassan Mahmoud (22045166)
Yaman A. Khamis (22045169)
Luis Furuya‐Kanamori (14778820)
Jennifer C. Stone (14053092)
Suhail A. Doi (9552474)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06-12T09:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1111/jebm.12618
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/MASTER_scale_for_methodological_quality_assessment_Reliability_assessment_and_update/29898530
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Health sciences
Epidemiology
Methodological quality (mQ)
Evidence synthesis
Analytical studies
Internal validity
Systematic error
Risk of bias
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <p dir="ltr">In evidence synthesis of analytical studies, methodological quality (mQ) assessment is necessary to determine the extent to which internal validity safeguards are implemented in the included studies against a list of selected safeguards in an assessment tool. Such mQ tools consist of internal validity safeguards that are checked against those put in place by researchers when they undertake research to guard against systematic error in the design, conduct, and analysis of a study. However, consistency or agreement among the individuals undertaking an assessment of implemented safeguards in published research against those listed in a mQ tool needs to be documented to ensure that the tool is reliable. Therefore mQ tools need to have their interrater reliability tested in order to ensure the consistency of their use in research.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12618" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12618</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_dc94d726109d20de6743159a24c22a16
identifier_str_mv 10.1111/jebm.12618
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/29898530
publishDate 2024
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and updateAshraf I. Ahmed (22045163)Muhammad Zain Kaleem (18021955)Amgad Mohamed Elshoeibi (17430963)Abdalla Moustafa Elsayed (17807330)Elhassan Mahmoud (22045166)Yaman A. Khamis (22045169)Luis Furuya‐Kanamori (14778820)Jennifer C. Stone (14053092)Suhail A. Doi (9552474)Biomedical and clinical sciencesClinical sciencesHealth sciencesEpidemiologyMethodological quality (mQ)Evidence synthesisAnalytical studiesInternal validitySystematic errorRisk of bias<p dir="ltr">In evidence synthesis of analytical studies, methodological quality (mQ) assessment is necessary to determine the extent to which internal validity safeguards are implemented in the included studies against a list of selected safeguards in an assessment tool. Such mQ tools consist of internal validity safeguards that are checked against those put in place by researchers when they undertake research to guard against systematic error in the design, conduct, and analysis of a study. However, consistency or agreement among the individuals undertaking an assessment of implemented safeguards in published research against those listed in a mQ tool needs to be documented to ensure that the tool is reliable. Therefore mQ tools need to have their interrater reliability tested in order to ensure the consistency of their use in research.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12618" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12618</a></p>2024-06-12T09:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1111/jebm.12618https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/MASTER_scale_for_methodological_quality_assessment_Reliability_assessment_and_update/29898530CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/298985302024-06-12T09:00:00Z
spellingShingle MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update
Ashraf I. Ahmed (22045163)
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Health sciences
Epidemiology
Methodological quality (mQ)
Evidence synthesis
Analytical studies
Internal validity
Systematic error
Risk of bias
status_str publishedVersion
title MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update
title_full MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update
title_fullStr MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update
title_full_unstemmed MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update
title_short MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update
title_sort MASTER scale for methodological quality assessment: Reliability assessment and update
topic Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Health sciences
Epidemiology
Methodological quality (mQ)
Evidence synthesis
Analytical studies
Internal validity
Systematic error
Risk of bias