Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements
<h2>Background</h2><p dir="ltr">The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of calcium silicate cements using a digital imaging method.</p><h2>Methods</h2><p dir="ltr">Four calcium silicate cements, NeoMTA 2, OrthoMTA, ProRoot MT...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1864513533073424384 |
|---|---|
| author | Havva Gozde Sen (17014155) |
| author2 | Dilek Helvacioglu-Yigit (15248780) Ayca Yilmaz (17014158) |
| author2_role | author author |
| author_facet | Havva Gozde Sen (17014155) Dilek Helvacioglu-Yigit (15248780) Ayca Yilmaz (17014158) |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Havva Gozde Sen (17014155) Dilek Helvacioglu-Yigit (15248780) Ayca Yilmaz (17014158) |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-07-15T03:00:00Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Radiopacity_evaluation_of_calcium_silicate_cements/24941832 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Biomedical and clinical sciences Dentistry Biodentine Calcium silicate cements NeoMTA 2 OrthoMTA ProRoot MTA Radiopacity |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Text Journal contribution info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text contribution to journal |
| description | <h2>Background</h2><p dir="ltr">The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of calcium silicate cements using a digital imaging method.</p><h2>Methods</h2><p dir="ltr">Four calcium silicate cements, NeoMTA 2, OrthoMTA, ProRoot MTA, and Biodentine, were used in this study. Disk-shaped samples were prepared from each material and placed on a plexiglass plate. An aluminum step-wedge was placed alongside the samples on a digital sensor and exposed to 70 kVp and 8 mA from 30 cm away for 0.32 s. The greyness values of the tested materials were measured digitally with the system software and compared with those of the step-wedge to determine the equivalent aluminum thickness.</p><h2>Results</h2><p dir="ltr">The radiopacity values, expressed in equivalent millimetres of aluminum, of the studied materials ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, NeoMTA 2, and Biodentine were 4.32 ± 0.17 mm Al, 3.92 ± 0.09 mm Al, 3.83 ± 0.07 mm Al, and 2.29 ± 0.21 mm Al, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the mean radiographic density values of the tested materials (p < 0.05).</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p dir="ltr">ProRoot MTA was the most radiopaque root canal filling material among the tested materials. All materials, except Biodentine, were found to be compliant with the minimum radiopacity requirements of ISO 6876 and ADA 57 standards.</p><p dir="ltr"><br></p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: BMC Oral Health<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w</a></p> |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| id | Manara2_e4b8c2009fd25e7b14fd670e73eaad92 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w |
| network_acronym_str | Manara2 |
| network_name_str | Manara2 |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:figshare.com:article/24941832 |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 |
| spelling | Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cementsHavva Gozde Sen (17014155)Dilek Helvacioglu-Yigit (15248780)Ayca Yilmaz (17014158)Biomedical and clinical sciencesDentistryBiodentineCalcium silicate cementsNeoMTA 2OrthoMTAProRoot MTARadiopacity<h2>Background</h2><p dir="ltr">The aim of this study was to compare the radiopacity of calcium silicate cements using a digital imaging method.</p><h2>Methods</h2><p dir="ltr">Four calcium silicate cements, NeoMTA 2, OrthoMTA, ProRoot MTA, and Biodentine, were used in this study. Disk-shaped samples were prepared from each material and placed on a plexiglass plate. An aluminum step-wedge was placed alongside the samples on a digital sensor and exposed to 70 kVp and 8 mA from 30 cm away for 0.32 s. The greyness values of the tested materials were measured digitally with the system software and compared with those of the step-wedge to determine the equivalent aluminum thickness.</p><h2>Results</h2><p dir="ltr">The radiopacity values, expressed in equivalent millimetres of aluminum, of the studied materials ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, NeoMTA 2, and Biodentine were 4.32 ± 0.17 mm Al, 3.92 ± 0.09 mm Al, 3.83 ± 0.07 mm Al, and 2.29 ± 0.21 mm Al, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the mean radiographic density values of the tested materials (p < 0.05).</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p dir="ltr">ProRoot MTA was the most radiopaque root canal filling material among the tested materials. All materials, except Biodentine, were found to be compliant with the minimum radiopacity requirements of ISO 6876 and ADA 57 standards.</p><p dir="ltr"><br></p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: BMC Oral Health<br>License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03182-w</a></p>2023-07-15T03:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.1186/s12903-023-03182-whttps://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Radiopacity_evaluation_of_calcium_silicate_cements/24941832CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/249418322023-07-15T03:00:00Z |
| spellingShingle | Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements Havva Gozde Sen (17014155) Biomedical and clinical sciences Dentistry Biodentine Calcium silicate cements NeoMTA 2 OrthoMTA ProRoot MTA Radiopacity |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements |
| title_full | Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements |
| title_fullStr | Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements |
| title_full_unstemmed | Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements |
| title_short | Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements |
| title_sort | Radiopacity evaluation of calcium silicate cements |
| topic | Biomedical and clinical sciences Dentistry Biodentine Calcium silicate cements NeoMTA 2 OrthoMTA ProRoot MTA Radiopacity |