Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest Design

<div><p>The aims of the present study were to determine test-retest reliability for unilateral strength and power tests used to quantify asymmetry and determine the consistency of both the magnitude and direction of asymmetry between test sessions. Twenty-eight recreational trained sport...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Chris Bishop (5534846) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Paul Read (7244627) (author), Shyam Chavda (16640920) (author), Paul Jarvis (99761) (author), Anthony Turner (744951) (author)
منشور في: 2019
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1864513520678207488
author Chris Bishop (5534846)
author2 Paul Read (7244627)
Shyam Chavda (16640920)
Paul Jarvis (99761)
Anthony Turner (744951)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_facet Chris Bishop (5534846)
Paul Read (7244627)
Shyam Chavda (16640920)
Paul Jarvis (99761)
Anthony Turner (744951)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chris Bishop (5534846)
Paul Read (7244627)
Shyam Chavda (16640920)
Paul Jarvis (99761)
Anthony Turner (744951)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-04T03:00:00Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.3390/sports7030058
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Using_Unilateral_Strength_Power_and_Reactive_Strength_Tests_to_Detect_the_Magnitude_and_Direction_of_Asymmetry_A_Test-Retest_Design/25406050
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Inter-limb differences
limb dominance
variability
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest Design
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Text
Journal contribution
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
text
contribution to journal
description <div><p>The aims of the present study were to determine test-retest reliability for unilateral strength and power tests used to quantify asymmetry and determine the consistency of both the magnitude and direction of asymmetry between test sessions. Twenty-eight recreational trained sport athletes performed unilateral isometric squat, countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) tests over two test sessions. Inter-limb asymmetry was calculated from both the best trial and as an average of three trials for each test. Test reliability was computed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV) and standard error of measurement (SEM). In addition, paired samples t-tests were used to determine systematic bias between test sessions and Kappa coefficients to report how consistently asymmetry favoured the same side. Within and between-session reliability ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC range = 0.70–0.96) and CV values ranged from 3.7–13.7% across tests. Significant differences in asymmetry between test sessions were seen for impulse during the isometric squat (p = 0.04; effect size = –0.60) but only when calculating from the best trial. When computing the direction of asymmetry across test sessions, levels of agreement were fair to substantial for the isometric squat (Kappa = 0.29–0.64), substantial for the CMJ (Kappa = 0.64–0.66) and fair to moderate for the DJ (Kappa = 0.36–0.56). These results show that when asymmetry is computed between test sessions, the group mean is generally devoid of systematic bias; however, the direction of asymmetry shows greater variability and is often inter-changeable. Thus, practitioners should consider both the direction and magnitude of asymmetry when monitoring inter-limb differences in healthy athlete populations.</p><p> </p></div><h2>Other Information</h2> <p> Published in: Sports<br> License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7030058" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7030058</a></p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara2_f8a86b2916158b7839dc51b8a66c0058
identifier_str_mv 10.3390/sports7030058
network_acronym_str Manara2
network_name_str Manara2
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/25406050
publishDate 2019
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest DesignChris Bishop (5534846)Paul Read (7244627)Shyam Chavda (16640920)Paul Jarvis (99761)Anthony Turner (744951)Biomedical and clinical sciencesClinical sciencesInter-limb differenceslimb dominancevariability<div><p>The aims of the present study were to determine test-retest reliability for unilateral strength and power tests used to quantify asymmetry and determine the consistency of both the magnitude and direction of asymmetry between test sessions. Twenty-eight recreational trained sport athletes performed unilateral isometric squat, countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) tests over two test sessions. Inter-limb asymmetry was calculated from both the best trial and as an average of three trials for each test. Test reliability was computed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV) and standard error of measurement (SEM). In addition, paired samples t-tests were used to determine systematic bias between test sessions and Kappa coefficients to report how consistently asymmetry favoured the same side. Within and between-session reliability ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC range = 0.70–0.96) and CV values ranged from 3.7–13.7% across tests. Significant differences in asymmetry between test sessions were seen for impulse during the isometric squat (p = 0.04; effect size = –0.60) but only when calculating from the best trial. When computing the direction of asymmetry across test sessions, levels of agreement were fair to substantial for the isometric squat (Kappa = 0.29–0.64), substantial for the CMJ (Kappa = 0.64–0.66) and fair to moderate for the DJ (Kappa = 0.36–0.56). These results show that when asymmetry is computed between test sessions, the group mean is generally devoid of systematic bias; however, the direction of asymmetry shows greater variability and is often inter-changeable. Thus, practitioners should consider both the direction and magnitude of asymmetry when monitoring inter-limb differences in healthy athlete populations.</p><p> </p></div><h2>Other Information</h2> <p> Published in: Sports<br> License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7030058" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7030058</a></p>2019-03-04T03:00:00ZTextJournal contributioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextcontribution to journal10.3390/sports7030058https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Using_Unilateral_Strength_Power_and_Reactive_Strength_Tests_to_Detect_the_Magnitude_and_Direction_of_Asymmetry_A_Test-Retest_Design/25406050CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/254060502019-03-04T03:00:00Z
spellingShingle Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest Design
Chris Bishop (5534846)
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Inter-limb differences
limb dominance
variability
status_str publishedVersion
title Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest Design
title_full Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest Design
title_fullStr Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest Design
title_full_unstemmed Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest Design
title_short Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest Design
title_sort Using Unilateral Strength, Power and Reactive Strength Tests to Detect the Magnitude and Direction of Asymmetry: A Test-Retest Design
topic Biomedical and clinical sciences
Clinical sciences
Inter-limb differences
limb dominance
variability