Primary healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cancer screening recommendation and referral in Georgia, 2023

<p>Cancer screening uptake in Georgia is only 13%. We aimed to assess cancer screening recommendations and referral practices among primary health care providers (PHC) and factors associated with these practices.</p> <p>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 2,958 doctors and nur...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marina Topuridze (6691676) (author)
Outros Autores: Ana Kareli (13979946) (author), Givi Javashvili (22676098) (author), Nino Kiknadze (14035134) (author), Nino Shiukashvili (22676101) (author), Teona Todua (22676104) (author), Tamar Melikidze (22676107) (author), Ketevan Khetsuriani (22676110) (author), Davit Otiashvili (22676113) (author)
Publicado em: 2025
Assuntos:
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
Descrição
Resumo:<p>Cancer screening uptake in Georgia is only 13%. We aimed to assess cancer screening recommendations and referral practices among primary health care providers (PHC) and factors associated with these practices.</p> <p>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 2,958 doctors and nurses in PHC in November 2023, using descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analyses to assess the association between provider characteristics, system-level factors, and practices in recommending and referring for cancer screening.</p> <p>Respondents were predominantly female (95%), mean age of 57.5 years, family doctors (56%), with >20 years’ work experience (60%) and rural practice (67%). Almost all (98%) reported actively recommending and referring patients for cancer screening; however, 64.7% did so for only 1–5 patients per week, while 12% reported none. Predictors of higher recommendation and referral rates (≥6 patients per week) included being a family doctor (AOR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.11–1.67; <i>p</i> = 0.003), working in the capital city – Tbilisi (AOR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.14–1.95; <i>p</i> = 0.003), receiving comprehensive cancer screening training (AOR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.04–1.68; <i>p</i> = 0.024), reporting adequate infrastructure (AOR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.07–1.81; <i>p</i> = 0.015), reporting proper public promotion (AOR 1.41; 95% CI: 1.12–1.78; <i>p</i> = 0.003), and perceiving screening as part of their role (AOR 1.87; 95% CI: 1.52–2.30; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p> <p>Despite strong belief in cancer screening, recommendation and referral rates remain low, underscoring the urgent need for policy reforms to enhance education, raise awareness, and improve infrastructure for effective cancer screening initiatives.</p>