Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities.
<p>Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities.</p>
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 其他作者: | , , , , , , |
| 出版: |
2025
|
| 主题: | |
| 标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
| _version_ | 1849927628621873152 |
|---|---|
| author | Becca Beets (12878526) |
| author2 | Mikhaila N. Calice (11219393) Lindsey Middleton (22683351) Dominique Brossard (664716) Dietram A. Scheufele (6659144) Luye Bao (10925607) Todd P. Newman (9342839) Jo Handelsman (63388) |
| author2_role | author author author author author author author |
| author_facet | Becca Beets (12878526) Mikhaila N. Calice (11219393) Lindsey Middleton (22683351) Dominique Brossard (664716) Dietram A. Scheufele (6659144) Luye Bao (10925607) Todd P. Newman (9342839) Jo Handelsman (63388) |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Becca Beets (12878526) Mikhaila N. Calice (11219393) Lindsey Middleton (22683351) Dominique Brossard (664716) Dietram A. Scheufele (6659144) Luye Bao (10925607) Todd P. Newman (9342839) Jo Handelsman (63388) |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2025-11-25T18:27:57Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0337189.t002 |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Results_of_reliability_tests_for_the_five_sub-dimensions_of_engagement_activities_/30713736 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Evolutionary Biology Science Policy Infectious Diseases using survey data systematic concept explication scientists &# 8217 thirteen different activities public engagement activities different outcomes public scholarship public engagement public audiences educational activities activities scientists well positioned united states scientific community science faculty robust categorization results provide professional status large land institutional level industry engagement increasingly recognized grant university future research focused collaboration direct engagement case study better understand also examine academic settings |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities. |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Dataset info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion dataset |
| description | <p>Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities.</p> |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| id | Manara_132623037b2afb0de931b7c0010c2524 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0337189.t002 |
| network_acronym_str | Manara |
| network_name_str | ManaraRepo |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:figshare.com:article/30713736 |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 |
| spelling | Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities.Becca Beets (12878526)Mikhaila N. Calice (11219393)Lindsey Middleton (22683351)Dominique Brossard (664716)Dietram A. Scheufele (6659144)Luye Bao (10925607)Todd P. Newman (9342839)Jo Handelsman (63388)Evolutionary BiologyScience PolicyInfectious Diseasesusing survey datasystematic concept explicationscientists &# 8217thirteen different activitiespublic engagement activitiesdifferent outcomespublic scholarshippublic engagementpublic audienceseducational activitiesactivities scientistswell positionedunited statesscientific communityscience facultyrobust categorizationresults provideprofessional statuslarge landinstitutional levelindustry engagementincreasingly recognizedgrant universityfuture researchfocused collaborationdirect engagementcase studybetter understandalso examineacademic settings<p>Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities.</p>2025-11-25T18:27:57ZDatasetinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiondataset10.1371/journal.pone.0337189.t002https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Results_of_reliability_tests_for_the_five_sub-dimensions_of_engagement_activities_/30713736CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/307137362025-11-25T18:27:57Z |
| spellingShingle | Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities. Becca Beets (12878526) Evolutionary Biology Science Policy Infectious Diseases using survey data systematic concept explication scientists &# 8217 thirteen different activities public engagement activities different outcomes public scholarship public engagement public audiences educational activities activities scientists well positioned united states scientific community science faculty robust categorization results provide professional status large land institutional level industry engagement increasingly recognized grant university future research focused collaboration direct engagement case study better understand also examine academic settings |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities. |
| title_full | Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities. |
| title_fullStr | Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities. |
| title_short | Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities. |
| title_sort | Results of reliability tests for the five sub-dimensions of engagement activities. |
| topic | Evolutionary Biology Science Policy Infectious Diseases using survey data systematic concept explication scientists &# 8217 thirteen different activities public engagement activities different outcomes public scholarship public engagement public audiences educational activities activities scientists well positioned united states scientific community science faculty robust categorization results provide professional status large land institutional level industry engagement increasingly recognized grant university future research focused collaboration direct engagement case study better understand also examine academic settings |