Fig 5 -

<p>a) Mean birth weight, b) mean weaning weight and c) mean daily weight gain during suckling (±SE) of pigs classified as neutral pigs (light grey), tail biters (black) and victims (dark grey) during rearing. Different letters indicate significant differences among the CatPig classifications (...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Karen Kauselmann (11795282) (author)
Other Authors:	E. Tobias Krause (7145528) (author), Hansjörg Schrade (9671242) (author), Lars Schrader (712972) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Neuroscience Ecology Sociology Science Policy Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified retrospective exploratory evaluation retrospective explorative study retrospective explorative nature biggest welfare problems based enrichment materials individual tail biters tail biting events div >< p identify individual pigs four different studies tail biting could weight parameters covaried fattening </ p identified 8 pens tail biting 8 pens weight parameters priori </ feeding could 6 pens 4 pens weaning weight thus prediction suitable indicators start weight neutral pig investigated whether individuals involved feeding data feed consumption fattening independent early detection days prior behavioural changes behaviour prior behaviour involved 9 trials 72 pigs 24 pigs 192 pigs 12 pigs 02 ). 001 ), 0001 ). 0001 ),
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	<p>a) Mean birth weight, b) mean weaning weight and c) mean daily weight gain during suckling (±SE) of pigs classified as neutral pigs (light grey), tail biters (black) and victims (dark grey) during rearing. Different letters indicate significant differences among the CatPig classifications (neutral pig, tail biter or victim).</p>

Fig 5 -

Similar Items