Bland-Altman analysis of US and Cobb angles across BMI tertiles.

<p>V1: validation cohort, first BMI tertile; V2: validation cohort, second BMI tertile; V3: validation cohort, third BMI tertile.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	JoJo Yiying Zou (22676490) (author)
Other Authors:	Shirley Lok Yi Ho (22676493) (author), Babak Hassan Beygi (22676496) (author), Changliang Luo (4537177) (author), Man Sang Wong (22676499) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Biochemistry Medicine Biotechnology Sociology Science Policy Space Science Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified lowest standard error designing screening protocols body mass index adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 76 – 0 73 – 0 0 – 17 ultrasound assessment may st </ sup nd </ sup interpreting ultrasound measurements 85 ), compared 3 – 15 spinous process method lateral spinal curvature assess spinal curvature ultrasound imaging using second bmi tertile correlating ultrasound angles 1 )= 0 1 &# 8211 weight group demonstrated 2 </ sup 1 – 24 2 – 18 spinal curvature weight group ultrasound assessments ray using iccs ), cobb angles 3 °). &# 178 invasive method cobb method bmi group rater 1 xlink "> tissue conditions suspected ais study investigated rater 2 radiographic assessments neither minimal findings suggest bmi tertiles age percentiles age classification 8 kg 7 kg
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items