Individual memory performance was predicted by a subset of iEEG signal components.

Individual memory performance was predicted by a subset of iEEG signal components.

<p>All scatter plots display significant relationships between individual-level signal components and memory performance. The <i>x</i>-axis displays the difference between the value of the signal component on hit minus miss trials. The y-axis represents behavioral memory performanc...

Täydet tiedot

Tallennettuna:
Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijä: Adam J. O. Dede (11554007) (author)
Muut tekijät: Zachariah R. Cross (12517201) (author), Samantha M. Gray (15280322) (author), Joseph P. Kelly (22683512) (author), Qin Yin (688027) (author), Parisa Vahidi (6252611) (author), Eishi Asano (10954801) (author), Stephan U. Schuele (8892719) (author), Joshua M. Rosenow (8892722) (author), Joyce Y. Wu (3162564) (author), Sandi K. Lam (10529066) (author), Jeffrey S. Raskin (22683515) (author), Jack J. Lin (7553783) (author), Olivia Kim McManus (22683518) (author), Shifteh Sattar (13215409) (author), Ammar Shaikhouni (5722517) (author), David King-Stephens (22683521) (author), Peter B. Weber (22683524) (author), Kenneth D. Laxer (14948857) (author), Peter Brunner (290008) (author), Jarod L. Roland (9193178) (author), Ignacio Saez (2165584) (author), Fady Girgis (17749833) (author), Robert T. Knight (7108925) (author), Noa Ofen (4059280) (author), Elizabeth L. Johnson (12688232) (author)
Julkaistu: 2025
Aiheet:
Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
using intracranial eeg
recognition memory task
graph theoretic analysis
sparse network states
direct stimulus processing
sparse connectivity aligned
external stimulus presentation
internal pfc peaks
internal hfb peaks
mtl theta connectivity
stimulus presentation
local processing
generated states
external event
theta oscillations
pfc changed
patients performing
global organization
frequency broadband
contrasting analyses
anchored either
analyses triggered
Tagit: Lisää tagi
Ei tageja, Lisää ensimmäinen tagi!
Kuvaus
Yhteenveto:<p>All scatter plots display significant relationships between individual-level signal components and memory performance. The <i>x</i>-axis displays the difference between the value of the signal component on hit minus miss trials. The y-axis represents behavioral memory performance (d’). Points represent means across channels within each participant. Red triangles indicate participants whose removal would result in the <i>p</i> value rising from below .05 to between .05 and .10. Relationships for which removal of any single participant caused the <i>p</i> value to rise above .1 are not shown. The signal component displayed along the <i>x</i>-axis of each plot is indicated by its title. <b>A.i</b> Signal component aligned to image onset during encoding that predicted memory performance <b>A.ii</b> Signal components aligned to HFB peaks during encoding that predicted memory performance. This panel can be regenerated using data contained in allSig.csv and code in allSig.Rmd [<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003481#pbio.3003481.ref112" target="_blank">112</a>]. <b>B.</b> Signal components aligned to image onset during retrieval that predicted memory performance. Note that ITPC at image onset, dlPFC ITPC, and dlPFC-PHG connectivity were important at both encoding and retrieval. This panel can be regenerated using data contained in allSig.csv and code in allSig.Rmd lines 376–460 [<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003481#pbio.3003481.ref112" target="_blank">112</a>].</p>

Samankaltaisia teoksia