The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models.
<p>The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models.</p>
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Publicado em: |
2025
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| _version_ | 1849927629684080640 |
|---|---|
| author | Uğur Ejder (22683228) |
| author2 | Pınar Uskaner Hepsağ (22683231) |
| author2_role | author |
| author_facet | Uğur Ejder (22683228) Pınar Uskaner Hepsağ (22683231) |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Uğur Ejder (22683228) Pınar Uskaner Hepsağ (22683231) |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2025-11-25T18:23:59Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0336846.g005 |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://figshare.com/articles/figure/The_prediction_accuracy_of_simple_versus_hybrid_models_/30713265 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Biotechnology Ecology Cancer Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified Information Systems not elsewhere classified small sample size lr &# 8211 evaluated using 5 assisted reproductive technologies artificial bee colony art ), yet address class imbalance support vector machine pharmaceutical supplement use enhance predictive performance abc hybrids outperformed abc hybrid counterparts local interpretable model abc hybrid model model performance supplement variables producing interpretable dietician support vitro fertilization synthetic minority studies rely sampling technique retrospective dataset regression tree random forest observed improvements nearest neighbors limited optimization influential features individual predictions improving prediction implemented alongside future studies four algorithms folic acid fold cross exploratory rather dietary data conventional algorithms concept study clinically directive binary representation baseline models algorithm models agnostic explanations accuracy ). 21 predictors |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Image Figure info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion image |
| description | <p>The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models.</p> |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| id | Manara_52f909e4ca114005bb04b13f6be533b0 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0336846.g005 |
| network_acronym_str | Manara |
| network_name_str | ManaraRepo |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:figshare.com:article/30713265 |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 |
| spelling | The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models.Uğur Ejder (22683228)Pınar Uskaner Hepsağ (22683231)BiotechnologyEcologyCancerBiological Sciences not elsewhere classifiedMathematical Sciences not elsewhere classifiedInformation Systems not elsewhere classifiedsmall sample sizelr &# 8211evaluated using 5assisted reproductive technologiesartificial bee colonyart ), yetaddress class imbalancesupport vector machinepharmaceutical supplement useenhance predictive performanceabc hybrids outperformedabc hybrid counterpartslocal interpretable modelabc hybrid modelmodel performancesupplement variablesproducing interpretabledietician supportvitro fertilizationsynthetic minoritystudies relysampling techniqueretrospective datasetregression treerandom forestobserved improvementsnearest neighborslimited optimizationinfluential featuresindividual predictionsimproving predictionimplemented alongsidefuture studiesfour algorithmsfolic acidfold crossexploratory ratherdietary dataconventional algorithmsconcept studyclinically directivebinary representationbaseline modelsalgorithm modelsagnostic explanationsaccuracy ).21 predictors<p>The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models.</p>2025-11-25T18:23:59ZImageFigureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionimage10.1371/journal.pone.0336846.g005https://figshare.com/articles/figure/The_prediction_accuracy_of_simple_versus_hybrid_models_/30713265CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/307132652025-11-25T18:23:59Z |
| spellingShingle | The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. Uğur Ejder (22683228) Biotechnology Ecology Cancer Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified Information Systems not elsewhere classified small sample size lr &# 8211 evaluated using 5 assisted reproductive technologies artificial bee colony art ), yet address class imbalance support vector machine pharmaceutical supplement use enhance predictive performance abc hybrids outperformed abc hybrid counterparts local interpretable model abc hybrid model model performance supplement variables producing interpretable dietician support vitro fertilization synthetic minority studies rely sampling technique retrospective dataset regression tree random forest observed improvements nearest neighbors limited optimization influential features individual predictions improving prediction implemented alongside future studies four algorithms folic acid fold cross exploratory rather dietary data conventional algorithms concept study clinically directive binary representation baseline models algorithm models agnostic explanations accuracy ). 21 predictors |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. |
| title_full | The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. |
| title_fullStr | The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. |
| title_short | The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. |
| title_sort | The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. |
| topic | Biotechnology Ecology Cancer Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified Information Systems not elsewhere classified small sample size lr &# 8211 evaluated using 5 assisted reproductive technologies artificial bee colony art ), yet address class imbalance support vector machine pharmaceutical supplement use enhance predictive performance abc hybrids outperformed abc hybrid counterparts local interpretable model abc hybrid model model performance supplement variables producing interpretable dietician support vitro fertilization synthetic minority studies rely sampling technique retrospective dataset regression tree random forest observed improvements nearest neighbors limited optimization influential features individual predictions improving prediction implemented alongside future studies four algorithms folic acid fold cross exploratory rather dietary data conventional algorithms concept study clinically directive binary representation baseline models algorithm models agnostic explanations accuracy ). 21 predictors |