Group differences in jumping synchrony.
<p>A) Jumping synchrony scores in the experimental groups <i>together</i> (blue) and <i>separate</i> (together). The box plots represent medians (center horizontal lines), inter-quartile ranges (boxes), as well as minima and maxima (whiskers) and outliers (dots). B) The...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1852015607173611520 |
|---|---|
| author | Clara Scheer (3210213) |
| author2 | Daniel L. Bowling (9230131) Niklas A. Hungerländer (22478021) W. Tecumseh Fitch (8669445) Lisa Horn (416201) |
| author2_role | author author author author |
| author_facet | Clara Scheer (3210213) Daniel L. Bowling (9230131) Niklas A. Hungerländer (22478021) W. Tecumseh Fitch (8669445) Lisa Horn (416201) |
| author_role | author |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Clara Scheer (3210213) Daniel L. Bowling (9230131) Niklas A. Hungerländer (22478021) W. Tecumseh Fitch (8669445) Lisa Horn (416201) |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2025-10-22T17:39:52Z |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0333709.g003 |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Group_differences_in_jumping_synchrony_/30420305 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Neuroscience Physiology Biotechnology Evolutionary Biology Sociology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified subsequent unrelated task participants &# 8217 investigate whether cooperating individually &# 8211 greater interpersonal synchrony interpersonal synchrony worked individually work together subsequently jumped social bonding potential effects later jumping growing body evidence suggesting equally likely either collaboratively current study collaborative treatment collaborative interactions additional influence |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Group differences in jumping synchrony. |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Image Figure info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion image |
| description | <p>A) Jumping synchrony scores in the experimental groups <i>together</i> (blue) and <i>separate</i> (together). The box plots represent medians (center horizontal lines), inter-quartile ranges (boxes), as well as minima and maxima (whiskers) and outliers (dots). B) The effect of the participants’ initial rapport (averaged across the two dyad members) on the dyad’s jumping synchrony score. The lines show the predicted values of the linear model with the predictors experimental group and initial rapport, while holding the non-significant predictor initial mood fixed at its mean. The shaded areas represent the pointwise 95% confidence intervals of the predicted values. Predicted values have been back-transformed to the original scale of the dependent variable (bounded between −1 and 1). The raw data are represented with dots.</p> |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| id | Manara_5df87a81b36f50aaec00d99db710029c |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0333709.g003 |
| network_acronym_str | Manara |
| network_name_str | ManaraRepo |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:figshare.com:article/30420305 |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | |
| repository_id_str | |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | CC BY 4.0 |
| spelling | Group differences in jumping synchrony.Clara Scheer (3210213)Daniel L. Bowling (9230131)Niklas A. Hungerländer (22478021)W. Tecumseh Fitch (8669445)Lisa Horn (416201)NeurosciencePhysiologyBiotechnologyEvolutionary BiologySociologyBiological Sciences not elsewhere classifiedsubsequent unrelated taskparticipants &# 8217investigate whether cooperatingindividually &# 8211greater interpersonal synchronyinterpersonal synchronyworked individuallywork togethersubsequently jumpedsocial bondingpotential effectslater jumpinggrowing bodyevidence suggestingequally likelyeither collaborativelycurrent studycollaborative treatmentcollaborative interactionsadditional influence<p>A) Jumping synchrony scores in the experimental groups <i>together</i> (blue) and <i>separate</i> (together). The box plots represent medians (center horizontal lines), inter-quartile ranges (boxes), as well as minima and maxima (whiskers) and outliers (dots). B) The effect of the participants’ initial rapport (averaged across the two dyad members) on the dyad’s jumping synchrony score. The lines show the predicted values of the linear model with the predictors experimental group and initial rapport, while holding the non-significant predictor initial mood fixed at its mean. The shaded areas represent the pointwise 95% confidence intervals of the predicted values. Predicted values have been back-transformed to the original scale of the dependent variable (bounded between −1 and 1). The raw data are represented with dots.</p>2025-10-22T17:39:52ZImageFigureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionimage10.1371/journal.pone.0333709.g003https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Group_differences_in_jumping_synchrony_/30420305CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/304203052025-10-22T17:39:52Z |
| spellingShingle | Group differences in jumping synchrony. Clara Scheer (3210213) Neuroscience Physiology Biotechnology Evolutionary Biology Sociology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified subsequent unrelated task participants &# 8217 investigate whether cooperating individually &# 8211 greater interpersonal synchrony interpersonal synchrony worked individually work together subsequently jumped social bonding potential effects later jumping growing body evidence suggesting equally likely either collaboratively current study collaborative treatment collaborative interactions additional influence |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Group differences in jumping synchrony. |
| title_full | Group differences in jumping synchrony. |
| title_fullStr | Group differences in jumping synchrony. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Group differences in jumping synchrony. |
| title_short | Group differences in jumping synchrony. |
| title_sort | Group differences in jumping synchrony. |
| topic | Neuroscience Physiology Biotechnology Evolutionary Biology Sociology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified subsequent unrelated task participants &# 8217 investigate whether cooperating individually &# 8211 greater interpersonal synchrony interpersonal synchrony worked individually work together subsequently jumped social bonding potential effects later jumping growing body evidence suggesting equally likely either collaboratively current study collaborative treatment collaborative interactions additional influence |