Table 1_Challenges of assessing acceptability in the context of cancer screening: a behavioral science perspective.docx

<p>In response to an increased focus on acceptability research in healthcare, this perspective paper highlights the challenges of assessing acceptability and the need for, and importance of, further work to develop best practice guidelines for evaluating the acceptability of cancer screening....

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteur: Charlotte Kelley-Jones (22679378) (author)
Andere auteurs: Ninian Schmeising-Barnes (22679381) (author), Stephanie Bonfield (22679384) (author), Lily Taylor (20702904) (author), Lorna McWilliams (8897633) (author), Jo Waller (3214623) (author), Emma Lidington (8310153) (author), Evangelos Katsampouris (9529354) (author), Lauren Gatting (17272557) (author), Suzanne E. Scott (9642055) (author)
Gepubliceerd in: 2025
Onderwerpen:
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
Omschrijving
Samenvatting:<p>In response to an increased focus on acceptability research in healthcare, this perspective paper highlights the challenges of assessing acceptability and the need for, and importance of, further work to develop best practice guidelines for evaluating the acceptability of cancer screening. We report the results of a rapid consultation consensus survey carried out to explore the extent of conceptual, methodological, and translational challenges shared by those involved in assessing the acceptability of cancer screening. Our findings demonstrate that the current lack of consensus regarding the conceptualization and definition of acceptability is a key challenge which gives rise to further methodological and translational issues. The implications of the challenges experienced by those assessing the acceptability of cancer screening are discussed from a behavioral science perspective.</p>