Biphasic stimulus shows different frequency dependence to monophasic stimulus.

Biphasic stimulus shows different frequency dependence to monophasic stimulus.

<p>Biphasic stimulus produces much less LTP than monophasic stimulus for 9 and 10 Hz cases, but there is no noticeable difference for lower frequencies.</p> <p>(TIFF)</p>

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Nicholas Hananeia (22683665) (author)
Autres auteurs: Christian Ebner (1276467) (author), Christos Galanis (15210328) (author), Hermann Cuntz (32618) (author), Alexander Opitz (295799) (author), Andreas Vlachos (47497) (author), Peter Jedlicka (179938) (author)
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Medicine
Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Physiology
Space Science
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Information Systems not elsewhere classified
results :</ b
previous experimental studies
objective :</ b
methods :</ b
like cellular effects
conclusion :</ b
background :</ b
strongly distance dependent
scale modeling tools
repetitive magnetic stimulation
biophysical neuronal models
1 hz protocols
successfully modelled plasticity
induced synaptic plasticity
dependent plasticity model
plasticity model
dependent spatio
scale modelling
burst stimulation
5 hz
plasticity amplitude
distal plasticity
term potentiation
term changes
temporal resolution
temporal changes
rms ).
previously established
parameter screening
neurons stimulated
neuronal dendrites
modelling framework
mechanisms behind
low sensitivity
high spatio
fully understood
detailed prediction
dendritic spikes
comprehensive module
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

Documents similaires

Documents similaires