Biphasic stimulus shows different frequency dependence to monophasic stimulus.

Biphasic stimulus shows different frequency dependence to monophasic stimulus.

<p>Biphasic stimulus produces much less LTP than monophasic stimulus for 9 and 10 Hz cases, but there is no noticeable difference for lower frequencies.</p> <p>(TIFF)</p>

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal:	Nicholas Hananeia (22683665) (author)
Autres auteurs:	Christian Ebner (1276467) (author), Christos Galanis (15210328) (author), Hermann Cuntz (32618) (author), Alexander Opitz (295799) (author), Andreas Vlachos (47497) (author), Peter Jedlicka (179938) (author)
Publié:	2025
Sujets:	Medicine Cell Biology Neuroscience Physiology Space Science Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Information Systems not elsewhere classified results :</ b previous experimental studies objective :</ b methods :</ b like cellular effects conclusion :</ b background :</ b strongly distance dependent scale modeling tools repetitive magnetic stimulation biophysical neuronal models 1 hz protocols successfully modelled plasticity induced synaptic plasticity dependent plasticity model plasticity model dependent spatio scale modelling burst stimulation 5 hz plasticity amplitude distal plasticity term potentiation term changes temporal resolution temporal changes rms ). previously established parameter screening neurons stimulated neuronal dendrites modelling framework mechanisms behind low sensitivity high spatio fully understood detailed prediction dendritic spikes comprehensive module
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_7u1adsolfbcrfmbdiho28nddq8