Correlations between self-reported ratings of attentional engagement and ISC-EDA or phasic EDA.

Correlations between self-reported ratings of attentional engagement and ISC-EDA or phasic EDA.

<p>Correlations between self-reported ratings of attentional engagement and ISC-EDA or phasic EDA.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Ivo V. Stuldreher (11897870) (author)
Other Authors:	Anne-Marie Brouwer (359929) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Physiology Biotechnology Evolutionary Biology Ecology Science Policy Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified ultimate applications may level sensory effects exploring potential differences 30 individuals attending quantify using self div >< p life inaugural lecture elicit different levels different target groups attentional engagement patterns individuals ’ eda computed physiological synchrony life conditions different ways different groups attentional engagement physiological synchrony physiological measurements work shows two groups times especially reported levels reported afterwards reliably related personal groups personal </ monitored eda metric distinguished explanatory factor entertainment domains electrodermal activity eda measures complementary value chance accuracies audience experience audience captured
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	<p>Correlations between self-reported ratings of attentional engagement and ISC-EDA or phasic EDA.</p>