$This figure demonstrates there to be no significant difference in relevance of CT on different fracture types where each group has been compared to the phalangeal fractures group.$

This figure demonstrates there to be no significant difference in relevance of CT on different fracture types where each group has been compared to the phalangeal fractures group.

<p>This figure demonstrates there to be no significant difference in relevance of CT on different fracture types where each group has been compared to the phalangeal fractures group.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Camilla J. Taylor (14307688) (author)
Other Authors:	Vanessa G. Peter (14307691) (author), Matthew O. D. Coleridge (14307694) (author), Andrew P. Bathe (10219382) (author)
Published:	2022
Subjects:	Medicine Developmental Biology Science Policy Space Science thoroughbred racehorses predominated slice helical scanner one diagnostic imaging fisher &# 8217 exact test demonstrated et al </ 6 %, 95 2 %, 95 suspected limb fracture operative computed tomography 55 ), sesamoid 55 ), metacarpal 55 ), carpal equine fracture repair blinded retrospective review surgical plan prior 55 ), tarsal 55 cases ct 55 ), retrospective review surgical repair surgical plan fracture types 55 cases 55 ). ct review two surgical surgical planning xlink "> three diplomates three categories statistical difference significantly changed significant role radiographically appreciable proximal phalanx operative radiographs minor relevance middle phalanx median age january 2010 general anaesthesia diverse range december 2020 ct relevance consensus decision cases divided 8 %)
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Be the first to leave a comment!

This figure demonstrates there to be no significant difference in relevance of CT on different fracture types where each group has been compared to the phalangeal fractures group.

Similar Items