Comparison of correlation coefficients of the ultrasound method and the Penn State University equation in different populations to estimate resting energy expenditure.

Comparison of correlation coefficients of the ultrasound method and the Penn State University equation in different populations to estimate resting energy expenditure.

<p>Comparison of correlation coefficients of the ultrasound method and the Penn State University equation in different populations to estimate resting energy expenditure.</p>

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ming Gao (115719) (author)
Otros Autores: Li Tan (157486) (author), Yingli Zhou (5297033) (author), Wei Peng (432211) (author), Yuan Xu (161775) (author), Hua Zhou (50017) (author), Arthur Raymond Huber van Zanten (21567762) (author), Yan Zhu (112437) (author)
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Medicine
Physiology
Biotechnology
Immunology
Marine Biology
Space Science
Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
quadriceps femoris thickness
penn state university
hospital &# 8217
general demographic information
psu ), mifflin
including cardiac output
001 ), followed
ultrasound may replace
muscle ultrasound evaluations
124 ultrasound measurements
mechanically ventilated patients
critically ill patients
us performed similarly
high bmi groups
early acute phase
675 vs r
612 vs r
refine ultrasound application
acute phase
cardiac ultrasound
psu formula
712 vs
682 vs
001 ).
ultrasound estimation
ultrasound data
bedside ultrasound
xlink ">
us ).
subgroup analysis
study aimed
sepsis subgroup
november 2021
march 2023
low bmi
less predictive
late period
established equations
critical illness
biceps brachii
aspen standard
30 kg
20 kg
1294 ).
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

Ejemplares similares

Ejemplares similares