Experiment 2. (a) Participants listened to complex noise stimuli and were tasked with identifying silent gaps within them.

Concurrently, tACS was applied at one of four frequencies within the delta range. (b) Hit rates and mean reaction times as functions of tACS condition. (c) For each tACS frequency, gaps were grouped based on tACS phase. Cosine functions were fitted to t...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Yuranny Cabral-Calderin (21492072) (author)
Other Authors:	Molly J. Henry (8039789) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Neuroscience Science Policy Mental Health Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unmodulated noise stimuli targeting individual frequencies tacs effects would tacs effects depend auditory stimuli predominated div >< p sensory stimuli prevail sensory stimuli dominate auditory stimulus frequency although tacs effects rhythmic auditory stimuli rhythmic electrical stimulation auditory stimulus sensory stimuli electrical stimuli sensory stimulation preferred frequency individual ’ auditory signals auditory rhythms auditory rhythm tacs experiments rhythmic sounds rhythmic information primarily modulatory previously demonstrated presented together oscillator model observed behaviorally n </ modulation depth free parameter findings suggest experiment 3 experiment 2 experiment 1 entraining behavior electrical rhythm 12 ).
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Experiment 2. (a) Participants listened to complex noise stimuli and were tasked with identifying silent gaps within them.

Similar Items