Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].

<p>Four possible, experimentally observed [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0326927#pone.0326927.ref012" target="_blank">12</a>], different mutual arrangements (topologies) of the interface chromosomes (chromosome arms 2L, 2R...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Samira Mali (8897903) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Igor S. Tolokh (1314408) (author), Erik Cross (21656212) (author), Alexey V. Onufriev (430594) (author)
منشور في: 2025
الموضوعات:
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
_version_ 1852018750058921984
author Samira Mali (8897903)
author2 Igor S. Tolokh (1314408)
Erik Cross (21656212)
Alexey V. Onufriev (430594)
author2_role author
author
author
author_facet Samira Mali (8897903)
Igor S. Tolokh (1314408)
Erik Cross (21656212)
Alexey V. Onufriev (430594)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Samira Mali (8897903)
Igor S. Tolokh (1314408)
Erik Cross (21656212)
Alexey V. Onufriev (430594)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-07-03T17:41:57Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0326927.g001
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Models_of_Drosophila_nuclei_developed_by_Tolokh_i_et_al_i_2023_13_/29472013
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biophysics
Genetics
Biotechnology
Cancer
Hematology
Plant Biology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
nuclear lamins leads
significant differences arise
relatively subtle differences
approximately 14 kb
increased structural heterogeneity
given genomic separation
genomic tad size
chromatin structure might
take experimental hi
interphase x chromosome
quantifying conformational heterogeneity
larger genomic distances
use bulk hi
necessarily limited single
div >< p
chromatin models examined
beyond 100 kb
3d genome organization
conformational heterogeneity </
increasing model resolution
3d chromatin conformations
conformational heterogeneity
interphase chromatin
bulk hi
chromatin models
major differences
2 kb
genomic separations
genomic distance
cell heterogeneity
models constructed
cell hi
work show
third relies
strongest near
standard deviation
single cells
similar trend
resolution limit
potential implication
modeling approaches
model resolution
loci distances
little effect
h .</
facilitate comparison
ensemble distribution
different resolutions
damid data
computational approach
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Image
Figure
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
image
description <p>Four possible, experimentally observed [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0326927#pone.0326927.ref012" target="_blank">12</a>], different mutual arrangements (topologies) of the interface chromosomes (chromosome arms 2L, 2R, 3L, 3R, chromosomes X and 4) and three slightly different sizes (<i>d</i><sub><i>N</i></sub>) of the model nuclei are taken into account. 18 model nuclei (single cell nuclei) were simulated using Langevin dynamics: the generated trajectories of the interface chromatin time evolution correspond to approximately 11 hours of biological time. The movie <a href="https://github.com/Onufriev-Lab/hi-c_model_validation/blob/main/ChrX_TRANS_X3S_1min_Droso_Interphase.mp4" target="_blank">https://github.com/Onufriev-Lab/hi-c_model_validation/blob/main/ChrX_TRANS_X3S_1min_Droso_Interphase.mp4</a> illustrates the time evolution of X chromosome in one of these models.</p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara_8d9e7ba4e95e64e2dc055e83a5ddb44d
identifier_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0326927.g001
network_acronym_str Manara
network_name_str ManaraRepo
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/29472013
publishDate 2025
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].Samira Mali (8897903)Igor S. Tolokh (1314408)Erik Cross (21656212)Alexey V. Onufriev (430594)BiophysicsGeneticsBiotechnologyCancerHematologyPlant BiologyBiological Sciences not elsewhere classifiedChemical Sciences not elsewhere classifiednuclear lamins leadssignificant differences ariserelatively subtle differencesapproximately 14 kbincreased structural heterogeneitygiven genomic separationgenomic tad sizechromatin structure mighttake experimental hiinterphase x chromosomequantifying conformational heterogeneitylarger genomic distancesuse bulk hinecessarily limited singlediv >< pchromatin models examinedbeyond 100 kb3d genome organizationconformational heterogeneity </increasing model resolution3d chromatin conformationsconformational heterogeneityinterphase chromatinbulk hichromatin modelsmajor differences2 kbgenomic separationsgenomic distancecell heterogeneitymodels constructedcell hiwork showthird reliesstrongest nearstandard deviationsingle cellssimilar trendresolution limitpotential implicationmodeling approachesmodel resolutionloci distanceslittle effecth .</facilitate comparisonensemble distributiondifferent resolutionsdamid datacomputational approach<p>Four possible, experimentally observed [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0326927#pone.0326927.ref012" target="_blank">12</a>], different mutual arrangements (topologies) of the interface chromosomes (chromosome arms 2L, 2R, 3L, 3R, chromosomes X and 4) and three slightly different sizes (<i>d</i><sub><i>N</i></sub>) of the model nuclei are taken into account. 18 model nuclei (single cell nuclei) were simulated using Langevin dynamics: the generated trajectories of the interface chromatin time evolution correspond to approximately 11 hours of biological time. The movie <a href="https://github.com/Onufriev-Lab/hi-c_model_validation/blob/main/ChrX_TRANS_X3S_1min_Droso_Interphase.mp4" target="_blank">https://github.com/Onufriev-Lab/hi-c_model_validation/blob/main/ChrX_TRANS_X3S_1min_Droso_Interphase.mp4</a> illustrates the time evolution of X chromosome in one of these models.</p>2025-07-03T17:41:57ZImageFigureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionimage10.1371/journal.pone.0326927.g001https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Models_of_Drosophila_nuclei_developed_by_Tolokh_i_et_al_i_2023_13_/29472013CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/294720132025-07-03T17:41:57Z
spellingShingle Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].
Samira Mali (8897903)
Biophysics
Genetics
Biotechnology
Cancer
Hematology
Plant Biology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
nuclear lamins leads
significant differences arise
relatively subtle differences
approximately 14 kb
increased structural heterogeneity
given genomic separation
genomic tad size
chromatin structure might
take experimental hi
interphase x chromosome
quantifying conformational heterogeneity
larger genomic distances
use bulk hi
necessarily limited single
div >< p
chromatin models examined
beyond 100 kb
3d genome organization
conformational heterogeneity </
increasing model resolution
3d chromatin conformations
conformational heterogeneity
interphase chromatin
bulk hi
chromatin models
major differences
2 kb
genomic separations
genomic distance
cell heterogeneity
models constructed
cell hi
work show
third relies
strongest near
standard deviation
single cells
similar trend
resolution limit
potential implication
modeling approaches
model resolution
loci distances
little effect
h .</
facilitate comparison
ensemble distribution
different resolutions
damid data
computational approach
status_str publishedVersion
title Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].
title_full Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].
title_fullStr Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].
title_full_unstemmed Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].
title_short Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].
title_sort Models of Drosophila nuclei developed by Tolokh <i>et al</i>., 2023 [13].
topic Biophysics
Genetics
Biotechnology
Cancer
Hematology
Plant Biology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
nuclear lamins leads
significant differences arise
relatively subtle differences
approximately 14 kb
increased structural heterogeneity
given genomic separation
genomic tad size
chromatin structure might
take experimental hi
interphase x chromosome
quantifying conformational heterogeneity
larger genomic distances
use bulk hi
necessarily limited single
div >< p
chromatin models examined
beyond 100 kb
3d genome organization
conformational heterogeneity </
increasing model resolution
3d chromatin conformations
conformational heterogeneity
interphase chromatin
bulk hi
chromatin models
major differences
2 kb
genomic separations
genomic distance
cell heterogeneity
models constructed
cell hi
work show
third relies
strongest near
standard deviation
single cells
similar trend
resolution limit
potential implication
modeling approaches
model resolution
loci distances
little effect
h .</
facilitate comparison
ensemble distribution
different resolutions
damid data
computational approach